The Forum > Article Comments > Hacking scandal separate from Australian media debate > Comments
Hacking scandal separate from Australian media debate : Comments
By Brendan Rowswell, published 27/7/2011The Greens-Labor media inquiry is an unsubtle attempt to bully the media into compliance with their agenda.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
Posted by Belly, Saturday, 30 July 2011 5:44:08 PM
| |
RPG, can you name a Leftwing newspaper or media outlet, that one can purchase read or watch?
Thought not! As the rightwing paranoia borders on irrational thinking; rightwing upbringing has a lot to answer for!! Did your mother never tell you? There are no reds under the bed!! :) Posted by Kipp, Saturday, 30 July 2011 11:13:26 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/world/camillagate-scoop-raises-questions-for-murdoch-20110730-1i5cf.html
If Australians just read this link. Look at the time it took place. How the information was gained. How and why it was used. Then each of us, if we care about the very foundations of our Society. Fairness/equity/ rule of law/implications far more important than privacy. Are we served by a printed and broadcast media more interested in a story than its impacts. Than the law, or balance. Can we prop up the hate talk from such as rpg,is it true any concerns about the above are to be seen as lefty loon's at work? Indeed we , if we fail to lift the rug, put the spotlight on, Murdock's International Media, all of it, we can forever understand we indeed are pawns not meant to be in control of our own thoughts and governments. Are some crimes to be seen as ok? Posted by Belly, Sunday, 31 July 2011 3:50:17 AM
| |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/29/what-next-for-rupert-murdoch-conversation
This link leads to a two sided debate about Murdock the man and his billion dollar play thing. It in my view is balanced, I long ago formed and stand by my view he has not only too much power, but badly miss uses what he has. I am convinced we will not, yet, see this open look at the much bigger implications than privacy involved here, bothy links are not going to be matched in this country, that leaves questions we must address one day and will. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 31 July 2011 7:56:42 AM
| |
kipp "RPG, can you name a Leftwing newspaper or media outlet, that one can purchase read or watch?"
The Age, SMH and ABC (you can hear and watch as well as read on the internet) in Australia, in the USA, the NYT etc etc .. ) you can apologize now, thanks .. or do you think they are right wing outlets? They admit to being upright chanting and howling lefties, why do you "deny" it? belly, give up the links, no one cares .. you seem to have recently discovered the internet, everyone else has been here for many years, it's not clever to post links .. do you notice you're the only one who does it .. why do you think that is, it's because, you're a Luddite and an ignoramus and behind the times .. I hesitate to call you names, you might not understand them. Posted by rpg, Sunday, 31 July 2011 7:19:59 PM
| |
RPG,
Posting links to back up your opinion is far better than simply venting hot air. I seldom agree with Belly's opinions, but with links to his source of opinion I can at least take him seriously. I personally believe that Murdock's News of the World paper which was less than 1% of his interests had a rogue element. There is nothing to indicate that the other 99% is also rotten. Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 31 July 2011 7:33:48 PM
|
You rebut your self very well, I am no lefty in fact the loony left is as much my enemy as your extremist views make you .
You need to understand.
In debate truth has Merritt.
Also to both over estimate your self and under estimate your opponent is to defeat your self.
I rarely see such blinding extremism linked to such bigotry.
Your reference to left is clearly such.
I do not feel the need to give you reason to continue your charge away from truth and honesty or your unfocused rant.
It is clear, just wait, Murdock has gone too far too often and your humble pie will be immense.