[Deleted for abuse.]

[Deleted for abuse.]

[Delete for abuse.]

[Deleted for abuse.]

Now now Bonmot,

Just because you are losing the argument and that you are showing yourself now as the very centre of the 'warmist rump' there is no need to get nastier.

You lack the courage to spew abuse under your own name. If you did I would absolutely shred your reputation. You've laid out enough contradictions to ensure that.

e.g. Start with us disbelievers as anti-warmists being minimifidiasts (sic).

ie. minimifidian: Exhibiting or requiring the smallest degree of faith: one who has the least faith.

Did you realise with that name calling you simply inferred that climate science and warmists required the exact opposite. ie. The greatest degree of faith.

I've been laughing at you ever since you used minimifidiaists as an abuse. But I agree with you that Climate Science and Global Warming is based on and requires the utmost faith. lol

You had ample opportunity to explain 'minimifidiasts' (Sic) but you arrograntly refused, thinking you'd been clever. Laughing stock. So easy Bonmot, so easy.

[Deleted for abuse.]