The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Time for Abbott to play the nuclear power card > Comments

Time for Abbott to play the nuclear power card : Comments

By Malcolm Colless, published 6/7/2011

The time has come for Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, to stop playing political pingpong with Julia Gillard over the introduction of a carbon tax.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Malcolm Colles, please be quiet and let us enjoy the best ever Punch and Judy show in town
Posted by skeptic, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 9:35:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Abbott may feel the N-word is the kiss of death. As some have pointed out the PM is taking 'direct action' by using Federal money to replace coal fired power stations in Victoria and South Australia with gas fired. In theory that was supposed to happen all by itself after the introduction of carbon tax.

It's early days though. These new gas fired power stations will produce fairly expensive electricity even compared to carbon taxed coal. There will be no rush to convert other power stations. I suspect in a year or two the Germans will be dragging their feet on the nuclear phaseout. Either that or burning more coal or importing nuclear electricity from France. Perhaps 2013 might be a better time for Abbott to talk about nuclear for Australia. By then we'll have a clearer idea just what can realistically replace coal.
Posted by Taswegian, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 9:43:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Deleted for abuse.]
Posted by John Ryan, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 10:54:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I agree with Taswegian in the sense that concerted discussion of nuclear power for Australia should wait until 2013. A compelling reason for this is not the "N" word but the "F" word - by that I mean Fukushima.

The risks of natural disasters or terrorism to nuclear power stations might result in incredibly high cleanup and public health costs. No Australian politician in his right mind would fly nuclear until a better idea of the impact of Fukushima on the Japanese economy and radiation sickness levels are known.

Apart from that Abbott would do well to let the already unwieldy hung-Labor parliament implode over the next two years. Opposition Parties like Abbott's usually do better sniping at poor Government policies rather than Opposition early on presenting alternative policies (like post Fukushima nuclear) that are so easily shot down.

Pete
see http://gentleseas.blogspot.com/search/label/Fukushima%20nuclear%20disaster
Posted by plantagenet, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 11:28:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
While I am a huge supporter of nuclear power, with the ALP kicking in own goals on a regular basis, why on god's earth would the liberals want to take the focus off Labor's stuff ups.

As plantagenet mentioned, when the Fukishima plant is back under control, the hysteria dampens down, and Labor is in an irredeemable position, then the coalition can begin tackling the real issues.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 3:24:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
One wonders what parallel univewrse Mr Colless is inhabiting. It is not a question of allowing the "hysteria" about Fukushima die ddown. That particular disaster disclosed some uncomfortable ralities about the nuclear industry, including but not limited to their capacity to lie about the scale of the disaster; the willingness of the government to be a party to that lie; the rapidity (as in the UK) where the nuclear industry and the government conspired to present a reassuring story to the public etc etc.
Fortunately there are saner heads in the world including the German government that immediately reversed its previous policy of developing nuclear energy. If only a similar level of sanity and concern for human welfare could be found in Australia. With cheerleaders like Mr Colless one might wait a long time.
Posted by James O'Neill, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 7:13:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy