Ooow!

( :>|

There you go again Pericles.More ad hominem.You have failed dismally in the past to address the science of freefall of the Towers of 911 and the forensic proof of nano thermite.Also the Statements of Robert Baer whom Nick Caldis the Deputy Commissioner of security and terrorism NSW highly recommends.Robert Baer who says the evidence points to Govt involvement in 911. http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Do your best Pericles,the truth will survive even your best efforts of subversion

I think you may have to check on the definition of "ad hominem", Arjay. It might help you frame your arguments better, and to recognize that talking through your hat is inadmissible as evidence.

>>You have failed dismally in the past to address the science of freefall of the Towers of 911 and the forensic proof of nano thermite.<<

On the contrary, I have refuted every single one of your fanciful suppositions. You simply fail to recognize basic logic when it comes a-calling, that's all.

>>Also the Statements of Robert Baer whom Nick Caldis the Deputy Commissioner of security and terrorism NSW highly recommends.<<

You have mentioned this before. The Deputy Commissioner's name is Kaldas, by the way. And there is no record, anywhere of him "highly recommending" Robert Baer.

Not only that, but Baer himself has stated "for the record, I don't believe that the World Trade Center was brought down by our own explosives, or that a rocket, rather than an airliner, hit the Pentagon."

Once again, it leads one to ask exactly whose 9/11 conspiracy theory you subscribe to, Arjay. And why that one, particularly, when there are oh-so-many to choose from?

What worries me is the psychological impact on you, when you discover that www.911truth.org/ is actually a disinformation point, established by the CIA as a honeypot, to help them identify any potential threats among the nutjobs who join up.

So far, they have been thoroughly disappointed.