The Forum > Article Comments > Optional voting > Comments
Optional voting : Comments
By Greg Lees, published 29/6/2011If voting were optional then politicians would need to appeal to working class voters less, for the better of all.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
They even bus them to voting booths.
So while we complain about the amount of money spent on elections and by various lobby groups and semi-official parties (as a means to spend even more, with no source of funding having to be identified - like Getup!) it would be worse, possibly if the money was diluted by having to bolstor the actual number of voters.
So instead of having all the paid political advertising on policy and various scare campaigns, we'd have to sit through ads trying to get interest in voting - so in effect, 2 campaigns at once.
Should people vote, only if they are interested, should the be coerced with rewards for voting, no .. but the temptation is there.
Congressional districts in the US are up to their ears in deals for voting lobbies and interest groups.
It is far worse there than here, most Americans I know would much prefer compulsory voting, and remove the campaigning for the disinterested.
Oh, and I believe Malcolm was Minister for Army, but otherwise agree with hazza that he is an old criminal who is trying to remake the image history has of him .. bloody unlikely!