The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Optional voting > Comments

Optional voting : Comments

By Greg Lees, published 29/6/2011

If voting were optional then politicians would need to appeal to working class voters less, for the better of all.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. All
There is some merit in this argument . The qualification I have in agreeing with it is that bogans might be incited to vote so as to defeat some sensible proposal , or to introduce some reactionary legislation [ anti - refugee or bring back the death penalty ] by shock jocks and One Nation style politicians . With optional voting , intelligent , though apathetic , electors might not bother to vote .
Posted by jaylex, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 9:08:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
When voting is not compulsary the poor are subtly and systematically disenfranchised. The standard of political debate would not rise. It would merely favour the rich over the poor. The so called greatest democracy (USA) does not have compulsary voting and I do not believe that political debate over there is particularly uplifting.
Margaret
Posted by Margaret, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 9:46:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Lees has pointed to a problem in the populist nature of politics in modern democracies. However,I am not convinced non-compulsory voting will fix this problem. Other democracies have non-compulsory voting and have essentially the same appeal to a lowest common denominator on a range of issues. Perhaps what might be most useful is if the major parties agreed on some basic principles around the rights of asylum seekers or if a charter of rights was enacted to provide a check on any potentially more outlandish legislative decisions. Such a charter of rights, if drafted accordingly, could allow any government decision to come under the scrutiny of international convenents to which that government, on behalf of its people, is a signatory. Imagine that!
Posted by jeffg, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 9:54:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I most definitely support optional voting; if people don't care about what's happening, they are not doing anybody a favor by being forced to vote. The outcome will most definitely be random votes based on some vaguely-remembered ad, radio discussion, or what some friend said which party stood for what- and that should NOT be what voting is about.
Not to mention the lines would be much shorter.
In fact I could see it now- we have a special day called "Voting Day"- where we stress that every voter will hop into their cars and clog the roads to vote- it will mean anyone that goes out and votes gets the rest of the day with low traffic because everybody else decided to avoid the jams!

Oh, and Malcolm Fraser most definitely IS a small minded bigot- no arguments there. Quite frankly as an unrepentant Minister of Defense and advocate of the Vietnam War, I think we should ship the old ratbag over to Vietnam or Geneva to answer for his crimes- be ironically a taste of his own medicine actually.
Posted by King Hazza, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 9:55:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Optional voting is not a "freedom", it is a cop-out.
Optional voting does nothing to improve the debate - public choice theory states you focus your effort on the median "potential" vote. To exclude competition for bogan votes you would need to formally disenfranchise them...
Optional voting permits the most objectionable of political strategies - encouraging people not to vote and then complaining that the Government is unrepresentative.
Posted by David Havyatt, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 10:01:52 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Voting cannot be compulsory and secret.

In the closet of a voting cubicle we have the choice of voting and not voting.

I voted informal all my life.

History teaches that Politicians are charlatans and that the greatest politician is the one who has committed the most of crimes against humanity.
Posted by skeptic, Wednesday, 29 June 2011 10:11:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy