Japan is 98.5% Japanese. Japan does not let foreigners vote and kicks them out.

No "anti-racism" protests.

Zimbabwe has ethnically cleansed almost all of white population, after seizing their property.

No "anti-racism" protests.

Singapore and Malaysia cane illegals and kick them out.

No "anti-racism" protests.

The UAE has foreign workers at its leisure. When they finish their contracts, all are sent home.

No "anti-racism" protests.

Yet any white country does any of the above, "anti-racists" declare WAR!

Why do "anti-racists" ALWAYS excuse or ignore non-white countries that refuse race replacement (Genocide according to the United Nations), but DEMAND and JUSTIFY it, for all white countries and only white countries?

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Something I have noticed:

All Brown Countries are Poor.

Can someone explain, what is so magical about the ground White people happen to be occupying?

Anti-whites, if I said I wanted a world with ONLY white people in it, you would call me a Nazi.

Yet so called "anti-racists" DEMAND a "Brown Future", for all white countries and only white countries and are getting it.

Isn't race replacement, GeNOcide, according to UN Law?

Lego,
"According to the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics, 55% of the handgun murders in the entire state of NSW between 1995-2000, occurred within the boundaries of Sydney’s most notorious ethnic ghettoes, which are full of “refugees.” "
I have seen the BOCSAR figures and there were only 39 handgun murders in this 5 year period. furthermore the largest number of murders occurred in SYDNEY LGA.
AND you don't identify which areas comprise the 55%. But unless you can identify the ethnicity and background of each individual in each LGA, you are just fantasising.
Your post is a massive beat up designed to scare people.
But it wouldn't worry you to let the facts get in the way of demonising people would it?

We obviously are all influenced by the social context in which we live, by our education, experiences, and even our family and peer group influences at times. Newcomers, especially if they have come to Australia in linguistic or ethnically distinct groups have always had a hard time at first. But past streams of migrants and refugees gave
Australia its reputation as a country of diverse peoples that is all the better for it.

Still there's no denying the fact that a volatile part of our community is living back in the irretrievable past with a fantasy of an all-white Australia.

Australian identity has changed throughout history and by contact with the global community. To-day it is questionable whether there is a single identity or not. There is no doubt that Australians seem to have a problem to define its unique identity. Obviously many people have different views of what the identity is. Our identity has been constructed over the past 200 years from popular images and myths.
Australian artists and poets helped to create the Australian Bush Legend. The same applies to refugees. When discussing refugees people often lump them all together and treat them as one homogenous species. Nothing is further from the truth. They vary a great deal
in their ethnic backgrounds, religions, and educational levels.

The same goes for refereces to the "White Race," or the "Black Race,"
Many people misunderstand what race is - and consequently use the term incorrectly. Many judgements have often been confused with racial traits though they have nothing to do with culture and nationality or intelligence, but only with the opinions or prejudices of those who made them.

What am I?

My ancestry is Middle eastern (Jewish), Irish, Scottish and British.

I was born here in Australia are were both my parents and 3 of my grandparents, their parents and parents' parents.

This talk of skin colour, race is just an excuse to hate people other people don't know.

Lexi:"The same goes for refereces to the "White Race," or the "Black Race,"
Many people misunderstand what race is - and consequently use the term incorrectly."

Well the 1948 genocide convention puts no qualifiers on the use of race as an identifying factor:

Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group

Do you Lexi agree that EVERY racial group is legally protected under internationally-agreed genocide law from deliberate demographic replacement policies?

I speak of:

High rates of immigration from the Third World, especially Asia (deliberately encouraged by Multiculturalists and the federal government)

High birth rates of those from Third World backgrounds (a fact well-known to Multiculturalists and the federal government).

Lower birth rates of those from British/European backgrounds (a fact well-known to Multiculturalists and the federal government, and encouraged by high rates of taxation).

Promotion of inter-racial marriages. A rate of say 5%, increasing proportionately over generations, will eventually lead to the genocide of the Australian People.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.