The Forum > Article Comments > Confronting Australian attitudes to refugees. > Comments
Confronting Australian attitudes to refugees. : Comments
By Jo Coghlan, published 22/6/2011The SBS social experiment: Go back to where you came from?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
Posted by Aquarius, Wednesday, 22 June 2011 11:21:37 PM
| |
Lexi has made the point, above, that detention is both unnecessary and costly.
Its an old howler that is often raised, and just as often answered but, seemingly never digested. Canada tried a soft approach with asylum seekers --and this was the result: According to Canada's Attorney-General, Rob Nicholson, 63,000 refugees ordered to be deported are still in the country and 41,000 have gone missing. According to Canada's Attorney-General, Rob Nicholson, 63,000 refugees ordered to be deported are still in the country and 41,000 have gone missing. According to Canada's Attorney-General, Rob Nicholson, 63,000 refugees ordered to be deported are still in the country and 41,000 have gone missing. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/agents-promise-tamils-boats-to-australia/story-e6frg6so-1225948082054 It is now hurriedly tightening up procedures --- but I wonder how far into the future it will be grappling with the social and financial costs of its earlier *more humane* experiment. Posted by SPQR, Thursday, 23 June 2011 5:47:49 AM
| |
It is totally unacceptable that under the tyranny of the anti-white Political Correctness Religion us white people are ORDERED to accept and even to "celebrate" our own demographic elimination or be ex-communicated from society for being "evil racists".
I`m no fan of Malcolm Fraser,but he`s right on one thing: "Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out." Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983) They may say they`re "anti-racist",but they`re not,they`re anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Posted by SteveRogers, Thursday, 23 June 2011 6:02:57 AM
| |
Aquarius.
You called my race, "mongrels" and suggested we be removed to Antarctica, what you're promoting is classed as Genocide under international law, why such hatred toward White people? In your opinion my race are "dogs", you'd only say that because we're White, you use the idea of Anti racism as a cover for your hatred of my race. You're not so much "Anti Racist" as anti White, Anti Racism is just a code word for Anti White. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 23 June 2011 6:41:32 AM
| |
So let me get this straight- if you have a hard life, and go through hardship to achieve your dreams, that somehow makes you automatically a nice, safe, sane person?
By the way, I'd like to add an interesting observation- judging by this forum; 1- QUITE A FEW of the anti-refugee side are quite willing to 'confront' whatever refugee topic and insinuations about the reasons why some people are hostile towards our current refugee intakes 2- ALL of the pro refugee side are avoiding my posts, and trying to pretend that its something else. It most definitely DOES seem that one side is afraid to confront the main issues- and it's not the antis. Posted by King Hazza, Thursday, 23 June 2011 9:14:13 AM
| |
A "White Australia"
resettlement in Antarctica What a great idea Antarctica is already "White" And we can blame the penguins Afterall they're partially black. Posted by Aquarius, Thursday, 23 June 2011 9:49:27 AM
|
Do you realise what a mongrel mix the white race is, especially the English with centuries of conquest from the east.
At least now we can blame the other races for our problems. But with a
White Australia are we going to blame the Poms, the Irish,the Scots,
and any other non-ocker that gets in our way.
Maybe we can start a new colony in Antarctica?