The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Have you seen the Treasurer’s copy? > Comments

Have you seen the Treasurer’s copy? : Comments

By Michael Hitchens, published 10/6/2011

Perhaps the Treasurer has a different version of the Productivity Commission’s report, Carbon Emission Policies in Key Economies, to that published on the Commission’s website, but nowhere can I find two of the results that the Treasurer claims are key.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
I share your concerns Michael. I am concerned that we have comments such as “assessing impacts on the competitiveness “, when all the PC provides is analysis of our “customers”? Surely we should compare competitiveness against competitors?

I also shudder when I hear the expression “market based mechanisms”. Yet public funding and tariffs are not part of any market based system. So where are these market based systems we keep hearing about?

The PC seems to have written their “liability exemption” into their report by providing the basis for almost any policy; they give some really good answers to all the wrong questions.

The last time the government spun and cherry picked a policy formulation document was the Henry Tax Review. The jury is still out on that one but I suspect this is heading in the same direction.

This will end in tears.
Posted by spindoc, Saturday, 11 June 2011 8:53:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
spindoc,
the wider australian electorate will not comprehend & will continue to be impressed by this kind of spin until the crap eventually hits the fan. Not too far into future I predict.
Posted by individual, Saturday, 11 June 2011 9:04:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Spindoc, your observations are right but, to be fair, the Productivity Commission can only report on what it is asked and on this occasion it had no say in what it was asked. Michael
Posted by Michael Hitchens, Saturday, 11 June 2011 9:24:58 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
individual, are there wider issues here? That the government does this because it can? Does that reflect poorly on the electorate? If so why do we swallow this rubbish? Should we have an expectation that our media might be a little more informed or dare I say, even critical?

There is something I’m missing here.
Posted by spindoc, Saturday, 11 June 2011 9:32:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Michael, don’t get me wrong I’m not blaming the PC, on the contrary, “tis a thing of great beauty and provides reason for all men and all policies and can forever remain blameless”.

The “Yes Minister” principle No 43 kicked in, never announce an enquiry or report unless you know the outcome.

The terms of reference set those outcomes and the PC has simply responded to them. As individual says, the problem is that we will not comprehend and will continue to be impressed.

Well done Sir Humphrey.
Posted by spindoc, Saturday, 11 June 2011 9:42:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Spindoc,
A yes to each of five of your questions.
Posted by individual, Saturday, 11 June 2011 9:55:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy