Hey Jewely,

Judge rules white girl to be tried as a black adult.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84phU8of02U

It's genius.

I love the parents...

'We're going to do our best to ensure Hannah is treated with the sympathy and sensitivity that she, as a photogenic white girl, deserves'.

'This is America. Nobody deserves to be treated like a black man!'

Now that she's been ruled black, the court has instructed local media to ASSUME she's guilty.

Suze,

'In my opinion, if there has EVER been any definite evidence of abuse of any kind towards the children before the marital breakdown, then the kids don't go with that parent.'

I agree. It's the definitive evidence part that is hard to obtain.

From all these discussions though, it seems to me the campaigners against shared custody would be happier with 'if there has EVER been any *rumoured suggestion* of abuse of any kind towards the children *during* the marital breakdown, then the kids don't go with that parent.'

"the campaigners against shared custody would be happier with 'if there has EVER been any *rumoured suggestion* of abuse of any kind towards the children *during* the marital breakdown, then the kids don't go with that parent.' - if the parent is male.

Allegations of abuse made against female's should of course be recognised as men just trying to get custody to avoid paying child support.

R0bert

"our feminist society"

What on earth are you talking about?!

"What's a migrant?"

Why, they are the people who ALWAYS vote for ME.

The silent invasion force, the Gerry in gerrymander, the bloodless Coup d'etat.

Of the 5 billion who, like you & I, have a divine RIGHT to settle here, above any environmental or social concerns, they are the ones's the Labor party chose to suit our divinity and our economic imperatives.

What's important is that people born here who don't vote LAbour deserve to be stressed into hoplessness, killing & ultimately into Gaol. We have no sympathy, only Law, economics and Nation building in-OUR-own-Anglo-image.

ATB

Ghoulia

PM

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11867#203248

Dear Jewely, no dear, in the case of a natural, normal, heterosexual marriage i am in favour of them being supported, encouraged to stay together, happily for life. What is wrong with good old fashioned Christian Family values?

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11867#203275

Dear Suze, all feMANazis have been have been promoting the breakdown of marriage, sex, drugs, rock & roll for half a century now. "The proof is in the pudding", dear.

The "us & them situation" was created by FauxMANistas, not me, i have always advocated for happy, harmonious, relationships between men & women.

Now you are getting closer to the problem, but as usual getting it the opposite way around. "Why can't we all just work together to do what is right for the children" in what is the ONLY family situation that has been proven safe, "lifetime heterosexual marriage"? As opposed to promoting the well documented, scientifically proven failure of single motherhood. Why don't you want males who impregnate women to be encouraged to marry them, love, cherish & support them?

Your also half correct about children dying, in more than 3/4 of those it was mommy dearest who killed them.

So of course we should go back to a "one size fits all", or "default position" where fathers (who have been proven safe almost all of the time) get everything until they are proven to be "at fault". Don't you remember, that is what we had prior to 1975? A "fault" divorce system where either party if shown to be the one, NOT "at fault" won.

Prior to 1975 men were regularly jailed for not paying maintenance. It was the Loony Left feMANazi's who stopped that from continuing. How can you punish someone who is not "at fault"?

Formersnag,

Men can still be jailed for not paying child support. That is part of the reason for hiding statistics and the denigration of fathers.

If he is not in favour of her having the children, and not in favour of having to pay her child support while she simply takes away his children, then he has to spend many years in a family court, and spend many dollars to prove that he should have the children.

He has to overcome the feminist bias that he is an evil male who will harm the children.

That is why the statistics regards child murders, child abuse and child neglect are purposely kept hidden.

By hiding the statistics, it makes it easier to denigrate men and fathers.