The Forum > Article Comments > Multiculturalism: at what point does it stop being an inherent good? > Comments
Multiculturalism: at what point does it stop being an inherent good? : Comments
By Jenny Goldie, published 25/2/2011Can multiculturalism be good when it incorporates cultures which do not mirror our own liberal, humanitarian and egalitarian culture?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
To respond to a couple of points in the article:
"At what point, then, does multiculturalism go from being an inherent 'good' to being problematic?" - when it stops being multiculturalism and turns into the monoculturalism that the author is promoting.
---
"Australia can be proud of its liberal, democratic, humanitarian and egalitarian culture. It must not be abandoned".
I couldn't agree more. Which is way the anti-liberal, non-egalitarian mindset of monoculturalism should be resisted.
It took Australia a very long time to develop this aspect of our culture, and multiculturalism is an integral part of it, regardless of those who can't see anything about it other than different skin colours and a wider variety of food choices, or who misrepresent it to mean everyone can do what they want (which is the old monocultural way - except everyone had to act the way those in the dominant class wanted to act.)
I accept that it is rather strange that the leaders of countries like Germany and Britain are saying multiculturalism doesn't work when their countries have never adopted it, but that's just another example which shows that not everything done or said in other cultures or countries is perfect.
Multiculturalism has a pluralist liberal-democratic ethos at its core. The fact that attacks on this core value should be resisted is just another proof of how false the repeated assertions are that multiculturalism somehow means anything goes and all beliefs, practices and actions are equally valid.