The religous right are saying, same sex couples should not have any rights, that they enjoy.
Jesus was never married and spent most of his adult life with a group of MEN, and he was born by virgin birth !!
Now come on you blokes, Joseph was Jesus dad so where did the sperm come from to create Jesus? ( you did do biology at school.Yes?)
I respect that this is hard for you all, to put into any sense of comprehension of understanding.
Guess what! Hitler was a "Fruitcake" and tried to exterminate the Jews, Gypsies and Gays. He failed because in this world, which you are apart of; diversity of being is a natural part of it.

Live love and be happy, and enjoy your life.

Lol Kipp!

Even the Pope seems prepared to discuss gay sex by 'allowing' male prostitutes to wear condoms when HIV is a risk.

If the Pope can decide on changes like this for the Catholic Church, why can't the average religious person allow for gay marriage?

Mind you, I would have liked to see the Pope suggesting that female prostitutes should also be 'allowed' to insist on clients using condoms, but I guess that would be too much for one announcement!

<<Abraham Lincoln freed black Americans from slavery and in doing so ushered in a new age of equality and freedom>>
False analogy.
Race is immutable.
Sexual behaviour is mutable.
Just ask all the ex-gays, who homosexual activists love to hate because they expose the lie.

<<gay marriage affects everyone>>
Unfortunately, the author got this one correct.
Think of all the innocent children who will never receive their birthright of a mother and a father because they are artificially conceived to be raised in an unnatural environment with dysfunctional role models.
Just ask Dawn Stefanowicz, who lived the nightmare that will be foisted on these innocents.
http://www.dawnstefanowicz.com/

Furthermore anyone who dissents from the homosexual line will be persecuted, as is already being experienced in Western countries which are adopting the homosexual agenda.

Supporters of Proposition 8 in California were targeted with violence and vandalism in an intimidatory campaign by homosexual activists.

The author fails to mention that Chief US District Judge Vaughn Walker was revealed to the public as a homosexual shortly before his "judgement" was made known.
He retired shortly thereafter, having achieved his zenith of homosexual judicial activism.

<<despite the mob voting for the denigration and discrimination of 10 per cent of the population>>
Try 1% homosexual and 0.5% bisexual according to "the new Integrated Household Survey (IHS), which is the largest social report ever produced for the Office for National Statistics".
http://www.medindia.net/news/Study-Finds-One-Percent-of-UK-People-Openly-Gay-or-Lesbian-74544-1.htm#ixzz166jTHxYk

<<mob?>>
Refer to violent intimidation by homosexual mobsters in California noted above.

<<A private moral view that same-sex couples are inferior to opposite-sex couples is not a proper basis for legislation.>>
Does the author have a private moral view that he is superior to Muslims who engage, or wish to engage, in polygamy?
If so, he is a hypocrite.
If not, why is he not arguing their case?

Does the author consider himself superior to adult, loving, consensual incestuous couples?
If so, on what basis.
If not, why is he not arguing their case?

<<2.3 million gay brothers and sisters>>
How can that be when there are only 480,000 in the UK?
http://www.medindia.net/news/Study-Finds-One-Percent-of-UK-People-Openly-Gay-or-Lesbian-74544-1.htm

Or is this the part where you say it doesn't matter whether it's 10% or 1%, after using the 10% lie to bolster your case?

<< Not for the sake of Gay Australians only, but for the sake of all Australians>>
Would "All Australians" include all those innocent young children of "gay marriage" who will never know a mother and a father because their birthright is trumped by homosexual activists "fundamental human right" to "marry".
It's all for the sake of the little kiddies isn't it?

Oh I don't know Proxy, I guess the children growing up in a gay household will get on at least as well as those kiddies being raised in one-parent households or those kids who are adopted, right?

I would imagine that people born homosexual who later 'decide' to deny their sexual orientation will still remain basically non-practising homosexuals.

They would basically be the same as any celibate heterosexual really,
wouldn't they?

Anyone who denies their true sexuality is lying to themselves, and to their God, who supposedly made them that way.