The Forum > Article Comments > The insidious apartheid of thinking pink > Comments
The insidious apartheid of thinking pink : Comments
By Monica Dux, published 23/11/2010There something disquieting about the sheer ubiquity of the pinkification of our girls.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
Bingo. But parents don’t know their baby is ugly, they can’t see it, must be some kind of biological thing.
Houel:”If a woman is looking to get custody, children are better off with the nature of the nurturing mother. But this nurturing is conditioning in the context of any gender pay gap, and women who choose not to work are only more interested in mothering due to conditioning.”
Works for me, least some are still interested in it.
I have always said (having dressed many a baby) that girls own pink and boys own all the other colours. I didn’t know it was a big deal but then I never looked for a big deal. My own daughter looked stunning in black but it’s not an easy to find colour in baby clothing.
Wish they had written about physical play, people are much rougher with baby boys although baby girls love really physical play too. And little boys love playing with toy kitchens and dolls same as girls.
Which brings me to a 6 year old male foster child that I knew, liked wearing dresses and high heeled shoes, pushing about a toy pram, also liked cars and classically labeled boy things as well.
Shrink told his carers to take away all the female toys he liked and replace them with trucks and only allow him boy things, when I asked the carers “WHY?” It had been explained to them in simple terms…. If a child liked stabbing people would you give him a knife?
Huh?
I agree Candide, little girls dressed as small hookers bothers me no end, I think it is like not knowing you have an ugly baby, the parents think they look cute.