oh squeers, so obtuse, there you are coming up with new ways and names to try to bait skeptics and yet, you remain confused, so many true believers are aren't they?

There's an easy solution, go back to the soothing ABC and listen to the calming voices tell that the world is as it should be, and not to go near those who doubt or ask questions.

All will be well, just adapt, it's what we keep saying, just adapt.

"You've completely misrepresented me; cherry-picked what I said and taken me out of context. Why am "I" not surprised?"
-Squeers

Dear Squeers,

No, no I haven't. Sophistry will get you nowhere. I have cherry-picked, but only 'coz the word limit on posts prevents me quoting folks' entire arguments, so I focus on the most pertinent points. I haven't taken you out of context, or misrepresented you. I would appreciate the courtesy of a proper rebuttal of my arguments, rather than this half-arsed attempt to avoid the debate you were so keen to have just the other day.

Gentleman.

Stop the on-line I know it all. I know how many years some of you have put into this.

Please!

Can we all afford to gamble on this time and date. The leaders of the world have at best, 20 to 30 years of life left. Dont you think knowing what they know, when the study of humans come into the equations, what would you do and say when old and nothing to loose?

We need younger men and women in power and not these old and out of date 20th century non-thinkers.

Sorry! Just letting out some steam.

If Iam wrong.....put your post down with all you have got, and I will see you all tomorrow.

Good luck.

BLUE

Riz:
<I would appreciate the courtesy of a proper rebuttal of my arguments, rather than this half-arsed attempt to avoid the debate you were so keen to have just the other day.>

Dear Riz,
economic rationalism is the system we all bow down to as though it were a God.

If you can't see the bleedin obvious, that humans are having a devastating impact on the whole biosphere, widely and compellingly reported across all media, or that it's unethical, I can't help you. You must be from Minimifidia (which neighbours Blefuscu and Lilliput).

The rest of your two posts "do", as I said, misrepresent me.
Moreover, they do not contain any "arguments", unless I missed something? Ergo I cannot rebut them.

Leo Lane,
It is always the refuge of the uneducated and moronic masses to resort to abuse and obfuscation.
No I will not “go away”.
I will continue to try and educate anyone that I think is on the wrong track and needs enlightening.
I may not have too much longer to see the unfolding drama that is the so called civilized world, tearing itself apart though greed and lack of knowledge because I am getting towards the end of my life but I intend to try and live for at least another 10 years, simple so I can say: “I told you so”.
As an aside, I understand that Exxon will pay up to $10,000 for a published article that rubbishes Global warming. Are you hoping for a hand out from that source?

sarnian "It is always the refuge of the uneducated and moronic masses to resort to abuse and obfuscation."

you forgot conspiracy theories ..

"As an aside, I understand that Exxon will pay up to $10,000 for a published article that rubbishes Global warming. Are you hoping for a hand out from that source?"

Oh wait, there you go ..

Do you have any proof Exxon does that, I don't mean from conspiracy sites? Then why not go public, I'm sure it be worldwide attention.

Unless of course, it just more FUD from the AGW believer industry .. is it?

Are you BS'ing, just for effect?

Do you understand what slander means?

Do you wonder why people are skeptical of AGW when it's believers resort to slander, and BS?

Mind you, thanks for the support, I can point to this as yet another example of hysteria and exaggeration by AGW believers.