Huggins, your whole argument just failed by your insulated religous comment. The essay is about human rights for all, without hinderance as you yourself enjoy, and which will have no affect on your life, whatsoever.

The young "gay" person probably committed suicide because they found out they have AIDs, considering the likelihood is 40-80 times greater than from normal heterosexual relations.

<<According to the non-partisan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the risk factors for youth suicide are:
-History of previous suicide attempts
-Family history of suicide
-History of depression or other mental illness
-Alcohol or drug abuse
-Stressful life event or loss
-Easy access to lethal methods
-Exposure to the suicidal behavior of others
-Incarceration
Not a mention of homosexual oppression.
Could it be because CDC data is fact-based,
unlike homosexual activist propaganda
where the ends justify the means?
No lie is too big if it advances the cause.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/suicide/youthsuicide.htm

The World Health Organisation gives suicide statistics for countries, albeit in age-amalgamated form.
Lots of luck using that data to "prove" that homosexual-friendly countries have lower suicide rates although I'm sure our homosexual activists will manage to find what they want to find.
http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suiciderates/en/>>

Proxy the WWW is a great outlet for those with personal issues, and for you its not a help.
Go and speak to someone, as your postings indicate that need.

"(British Columbia's) attorney general has asked the B.C. Supreme Court to determine whether the law against polygamy is consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and if charges may only be laid when the polygamous relationship is with a minor or involves abuse."
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/polygamy-case-opens-in-british-columbia-supreme-court/

And why not?

Canada already allows "gay" "marriage".

Why wouldn't they be looking at polygamous marriage?

Anything else would be polyphobic.

Come on you homosexual activists.

Don't tell me you're polyphobic!

That would be inconsistent of you.

Almost hypocritical.

If you allow one type of dysfunctional sexual preference you've got to allow them all.

Not that polygamy is particularly dysfunctional.

At least there are cultural and historical precedents and it's not particularly fraught with disease risk.

Not to the degree that other topical sexual preferences are anyway.

And polygamous relationships are naturally fecund unlike some unnatural relationships.

Proxy, I rest my case; get help!

Proxy,

It is interesting that you mention the word dysfunctional in regards to sexuality. I would not hesitate to say that the general opinion of your bigoted rubbish is viewed in this way by most sane people.

Of course, this is not a crime in itself, but it is really, really sad.

David