The Forum > Article Comments > China versus the US: it is serious > Comments
China versus the US: it is serious : Comments
By Chris Lewis, published 13/10/2010Will tensions between the US and China increase, and should Australia continue to side with the US?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
-
- All
I've never claimed to 'know a lot about China', who does?
Australia needed to improve relations with its former enemy for significant economic advantage, so NARA was the result, Australia and Japan needed each other, we had little choice other than reconciliation. We didn't have the luxury of 'settling scores'. Many Australians haven't forgotten Japan's atrocious war time record and the regular reports of Japanese 'selective amnesia', nor have the Chinese. China was invaded, devastated and humiliated by the Japanese in the 1930s and 1940s. A resurgent China might calculate it can punish the Japanese with, not invasion and devastation, but humiliation, at little cost to itself. Please note, I'm not making any moral judgements and suggesting that Japan should be punished, simply that I suspect that the Chinese might have just that intention.
There's an immense difference between the economic insignificance of Mao's China and its foreign policy and the foreign policy of the new Middle Kingdom.
Watch the video I linked on page 5, particularly in reference to Hugh White's comments on China-Japan relations.
You might be interested in this, Prof. Galtung's lecture is on the broad topic of a peaceful world-he mentions Germany's success in coming to terms with its past and Japan's failure.
http://peoplesgeography.com/?s=johan+galtung