The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > 'On Line Opinion' - the next iteration > Comments

'On Line Opinion' - the next iteration : Comments

By Graham Young, published 11/10/2010

'On Line Opinion' was extraordinarily visionary when it first appeared. There are dangers in being the first mover.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. 18
  14. All
lets all..try to get-on ..the SAME page

i awoke this morning with visions of the future fast fading in my mind...so quickly record some detail ..as i remember seeing

keeping in mind such destractions ..as is clear from things like my posting style ..and the law ..and that others wont like what i say[and claim not to read my words]..recalling its hard for a hungry man to think of things other than the threat ..or the hunger..[destractions]

so saying i saw a page ..much like the wiki-page...by pausing the mouse over the highlight bit ..more info was made available..[on the same page]

[it expanded with more info ..on that highlighted by the mouse over-scanning it...was 'LikE' a link..but kept one on the same page...but scored a 'visit'..accreditisation ..as if the adverts on the page had actually gotten visited]

much like the iphone expanding page concept..but while still remaining ..loyal to the page your on..[love the one your with]

its dificult to explain that i saw...not knowing the teq/names of that i saw..and of course the other concerns managed to erase much of the vision... such as would gmail send my message this time...[in the end i decided to post this to the open forum...as i know that works and if it works im still in the land of the blogger]

but take a ..new look at formatting...we have gotten used to changing pages to get extra info..[then when there get 'hooked'...by new things]...all by seeking the info...or trying to correct bad info

but all of us arnt equal...

some people click on adverts..[others never do]..so why should there be a base value..as all 'visits arnt equal' ..just as all visitors to the topic arnt equal... some come to give ..others come to keep the status quo..[stiffle discordant opinion].etc

anyhow my mind is now hearing 350 350...

and thus i move ...from my creative to ...my sheep mind
[my thought flow ends]...

just as others hoped it to end..that may not be how it is ..but is as my mind has been led to believe it to be..[cant think why...lol]
Posted by one under god, Friday, 22 October 2010 5:33:51 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
377 words that time, OUG
Posted by Antiseptic, Friday, 22 October 2010 5:48:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
reply to topic
i trust the word/postcount ..at posting
more than i trust you

you clearly got some problems mr septic
you cant make constructive comment on topic
only count words wrong

its not my fault you got a bad program

your like one same same
no comment poster

who counts words
rather than reading them
you seem literate

TRY MAKING COMMENT
not judgment

are you really so boring
all you can do is count
with a faulty program

try commenting on topic
have you no comment on the content?

this is becomming harrasment
are YOU..a serial pest?
Posted by one under god, Friday, 22 October 2010 3:40:50 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
this mornings thoughts are
WHO READS THEIR MAIL ANYHOW
[sorry just woke-up]

but the point being...i favourite my favourite threads
so only read interesting mail,..but in doing so might be missing much info

there are lessons to be learned from my recent experiences
[the first thing i did was cleaned up and read some mail]
THEN UNSUBSCRIBE A OT OF notifications..[that i never really read anyhow]

how this helps adds to this thread is a few suggestions
i only click on two of the many links[at top of the page]

the best/page...
i often forget to use
is the main page that lists both..[articles/general]

but of course there are the other blog pages etc
these would be better to become joined to the main page
where at a glance we can read the titles of ALL the various in/outs and blogs ON THE SAME PAGE

ie we dont really need open mail
or visit one or the other of the links
cause they could maybe be better? available..ON THE ONE PAGE..only

im sure the blogs..[for egsample may have interesting stuff/but never opened the notification email's....to find-out

other throwaway thoughts were renaming
our posts section into..personal blogs...

even maybe the ability to edit..or put[copy]..
best posts..onto our own blog page...simply with one of them new 'share buttons'

or being able to upload images..
[im only putting it out there]

trying to wander back..through my thoughts
to recall the REASONS..i sought to post this morning..

[the reason..i got out of bed today]
thus maybe reasons..others are reading/today
or maybe..visit more or repeat their rewarding visit..from yesteday

it occurs we wouldnt mind each 'page'...
of the click full-page vieuw..to each have a micro advert..
thus 20 page topics..would have 20 adverts..that might add more revenue[income]..

also those flickering adverts
SHOULD BE PAYING TENFOLD

we know..why they do it
and are not pleased
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 23 October 2010 4:58:11 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
the google rearch function has become unmanagable
[its deliberate...the function WAS great..but now includes so much scattered info..on too many pages..as to be only decorative..at best]

sggestions is to give 10 pages..[5?]..at a time
each with its own advert

next i would raise the issue of closing topics..[please dont]
on the issue of topics..avoid duplication..[often we have..'just'had our say here.../and a new one opens up...

but we said it all last-time/
then find comments closed

also...join simular topic's..together...

maybe available on the same page
[with links/adverts etc..if need be]

further on my wish-list..is a formal complaint mechanism
where the complain..includes a quote...AND OFFERS suggested corrections...!..[and then is included..IN the topic..[on the same pages]

any complaint..MUST have a..suggested edit
or else is spurilous/vexatious
or simply being difficult..disruptive for their own adgenda/or job

a general suggestion is to avoid auto updates
i hate it when a service..[option like vidio/sound..etc..STOPS WORKING

i dont get updates...[lost too many things that way]
hate clicking links...prefere the quoted bits ON THE SAME PAGE
[keeping them in house]..links get out of date or updated..re edited..they often disappear alltogether...so context gets lost

maybe more outside link options..on the personal-page
or photo..with id/tag...only because it has eye appeal[lol]

those pages we join to our personal blog page..[able to be edited][but origonal post..stays as it was posted]

ok visiters gotta go now
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 23 October 2010 6:26:45 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
am egsample is worth 350 words
at
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4008&page=0
Posted by samsung,
Saturday, 23 October 2010 3:29:27 PM
he was being flipant..[ok im presuming]

but i have rewritten...my recomendation
of how his post..might be made better

QUOTE
As has been said it..[ie - - - -]
Only is the word
as we know it

but alas
the condominium of thoughtlessness
compounds compunction
but only for..(86 % of the masses}

[it seems he used the uppercase *^ by mistake?]
[continue quote]

FINALLY
we wait with breathlessness
for it is extant
...but only for now !

while insuperable..{insepperable}..we can impend
the uprising..of the devil incarnate
in the recessional ambiguity

{of...[simply seeing nothing]..aks sgt shultze}

or worse doing the wrong something
but need we do at all

my remedy

wait for it

the Targum

A targum..is an Aramaic translation..of the Hebrew-Bible..(Tanakh) written or compiled..from the Second Temple period..until the early Middle Ages(late first millennium).

The two major genres..{which version sam?}of Targum reflect two geographical and cultural centers..of Jewish life during the period of their creation,..namely the Land of Israel and Babylonia.

Aramaic was the dominant Jewish language..or lingua franca for hundreds of years..in these major Jewish communities.

so let us add flummery..to the equinox of
recess..within

- - - - - -
= = =
believe it or not

...[my research suggests]..[this remedy seems too simple]
http://www.dailyhebrew.com/category/Targum/

so if..it could be expanded upon?
it might prove revelatory
[quote continues]

surely we know this to be truth

in anguishment..with benign hypersycrisity
which infects us all
within
without..but always

He has spoken..{clearly he is sam-sung]

He, the He of enlightenment
of simplicity empowered mesmerisms of metonymy

it so clear
so obvious
so

easy
{END quote}

then he changes topic..
[or gives his credentials]
or uses a traditional departure sig-nature

[im not sure which?]

could you ask him to clarify?

then add in the revelatory addendum?
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 24 October 2010 5:47:51 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. 18
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy