The Forum > Article Comments > 'On Line Opinion' - the next iteration > Comments
'On Line Opinion' - the next iteration : Comments
By Graham Young, published 11/10/2010'On Line Opinion' was extraordinarily visionary when it first appeared. There are dangers in being the first mover.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 19 October 2010 12:12:17 PM
| |
..[its only a token-fee/..only to put the concept out there
a base...for say/a link to the topic and a quick blurb... commenters get paid..<<..one point for each comment>> to use as we chose [on site].. the contributor can donate her 5 points back,.. or accumulate...or apply to an advertisers services.. [or redeem them via some gift..say a pen or a certificate of service[or a ribbon].. who knows...it was meant to be only a small-point <<so 20 cents each seems pretty fair>..its only a token gratuity just to say ...we notice your doing a great service i have a few words left so will think outloud some other points for egsample i love the abc big ideas... http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bigideas/ [who had a great show today] title of/What Can We Learn From Terrorists? Whatever else we might think about those labelled as terrorists, it is clear that their tactics have changed the world in ways that serve their religious, political and ideological aims. Moreover, argues Tariq Ali today, contrary to what people imagine, terrorism was neither spawned by Islam nor will it end with it. [he cleverly linked politics in the west [bailouts to neo capitalists..etc to their deregulation/privatisation of govt services [on the premise that govt shouldnt be doing so much [yet screamed /begged for IMEDIATE GOVT..bailout..] when their neo capitalist regeme was threatening to melt down http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bigideas/stories/2010/3033359.htm so i note it in the big picture section of the forum in say ...the subsection ...of olo suggested vieuwing for other members to comment upon... on these pages sort of like a one stop shop... but via members selection ..[of all THEIR favourited programs] but sorted into format..say abc/programs/..youtube clips sports/arts/ science current-affairs war disaster god news science ..news papers magazines radio/web sites..etc going the full specrum [maybe by topic or format/ cross referanced of the special sites ...we all get our info from] heck i was only thinking outloud i dont want to loose what we got here graham is asking for suggestions i thought i would suggest [its what i chose to do] Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 19 October 2010 2:39:27 PM
| |
OUGI
must ... [say] that ... my [eyes] go crossed when I read blank verse how to make any sense out of it Idon'tknow ?Because I'm surethereissomesomewherethereburiedwithin the [ ]s and even maybe on each line ? Live in hope.... Maybe schooling in the (fifties) ... ill-fits one .... to .... tolerate other forms of expression ? But it's sometimes worth the effort :) Thanks. Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 19 October 2010 3:05:20 PM
| |
loudmouth
I'm surprised you readtheserantsatall I can't be bothered if oug can't be bothered maybe thereissomething intersting I'llneverknow,orcare suchislife Posted by Amicus, Wednesday, 20 October 2010 8:45:24 AM
| |
Yeahyougotapointthere[A]micus......
I t ' s all a bit hard on us_old_buggers_who have_to_take_t_i_m_e_t-o \read_a_simple_,_clear_sentence/\= anyway,letalone eecum mings Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 21 October 2010 10:59:21 AM
| |
thanks for reminding me guys
with points ..we can fine ..personal-abuse instead of suspending their accounts keep up the destractions ..in lue of replying to the topic? isnt that ridicule..off THIS topic? whats it called ..when others ..drop in ..destractions..or ridicule others or is it just revealing bad form? i cant read your "block-posts" they read like mindless raves its like some of ya ...never heard of parragraphs let ye ..without sin not cast ..the first stone you got anything to add to the topic? not a thought ..between ya? Posted by one under god, Thursday, 21 October 2010 11:45:53 AM
|
Do you mean that a contributor gets PAID 5 points each contribution, while commenters PAY one point for each comment ? If the contributor can donate her 5 points back, I'm all for it.
So how much would one point be ? We're limited to ten comments per day, so 20 cents each seems pretty fair. That might make the more prolix of us more economical.
Oops.