Johnny, you started this not me, you can't back out just because you're squeamish about your Whiteness.
It's an Iron question.
ARE YOU PRO WHITE OR PRO WHITE GENOCIDE?.
A White person doesn't even have to think about a reply.
Ask an Aboriginal "Are you pro Aboriginal or pro Aboriginal Genocide?"
They don't even blink, the response is automatic.
Do you ask every Indigenous person you meet "Are you REALLY an Aboriginal?.
I'm actually sorry that I have to come to these fora to shut down pro White genocide discussions and it gives me no joy to shoot fish in a barrel.
You, Johnny have lost even the vocabulary to debate me, I don't blame you, it's not your fault, you've been made that way but you have to face up to reality.
You can't hide from your race, there's no escape because non White people can see you as well as I can, you have to take responsibility for it.
Will you answer the Iron Question?

Anyone who thinks “multiculturalism”, which is marketed as an appeasing alternative to “Assimilation”, is an OK policy –

fails to acknowledge, as most collectivist ideas, fail to acknowledge-

“assimilation”, like “evolution” and “breathing” is a natural process,

whereas “multiculturalism” likens to “revolution” and “homosexuality” – abnormal or unnatural processes

which impose a heavier and unnatural price on the fabric of the population compared to the natural processes.

If a migrant does not want to accept the values of the nation he is moving to… why move there?

It is the responsibility of the migrant to conform to the values and practices of the country they are moving to, it is not the responsibility of the host nation to conform to the expectations of practices of the migrant.

And before you ask

I migrated to Australia, so too my wife and we have, as well as bringing hard earned personal skills and abilities, which were in demand in Australia with us, assimilated Australian lifestyle and values

-

rather than expecting some “multicultural” stupidity, which can only find success in separate “ghetto” living.

a "sustainable Australia" needs "multiculturalism"

like a body needs cancer

Interesting viewpoint Col.
I wonder how you'd respond the the idea that "Multiculturalism" was designed to fail in order to bring about Racial assimilation?
As we see every day our "Aussie Way of life" is portrayed by the Right as being imperiled by potentially hostile minorities or on the Left by "Racism".
Frankly I see that hysteria as a load of Garbage myself, just two aspects of the same program with one goal in mind.
When I talk to non White migrants I get the impression that they find all this bickering a bit silly, in fact the most sensible views in the media come from White Racialists, Muslims and Third World commentators.
The Left and the Right are kind of between a rock and a hard place because, (horror of horrors!) White racially aware people, Muslims and other minorities are starting to talk to each other and sort out their differences.
The Left and the Right hate it when I say this but:
I'm more than happy for Muslims to form enclaves, wear Burqas, practice FGM, send money to whatever offshore organisations they see fit and have Sharia courts.
I'd gladly support a treaty with Indigenous Australians, support their declaration of sovereignty over the continent and cede the 40% of the landmass they are asking for to their exclusive control.
But...can I have part of the country exclusively for my people?
Can I have all White enclaves, schools and hospitals?
Australia is a big country, as Adolf Hitler noted it's plenty big enough to hold several states, some Asian, some White, some "multicultural", we could have a thriving continent like Europe and America were before the start of the White Genocide

@Johnny Rotten
>I also find taking a single line out of my posts and placing it completely out of context highly threatening as well - an attempt to silence my comments

Making comments about eliminating people, because their beliefs are not the same as yours, is threatening behavior, no matter what "context" you try to dress it up in.

JR, if you feel threatened by words, that you put on the Internet, with your IP attached to them, then it is because you know you have done something illegal and it has potential consequences in the real world.

Interesting that Dereck Smith affects to take offence at JR's obviously facetious throwaway line, while ignoring completely the racist filth promulgated by Jay of Melbourne. Speaking of whom, I really hope Jay lives in the actual electorate of Melbourne - it would be poetic justice for him to be represented by a Green.

Ditto for dear old Col, of course - who seems to have overcome his identity crisis. Welcome back, Col.

Hey CJ old Chum.
Why don't you debate me anymore?
Racist filth...well that's one of the dozen or so phrases you're officially allowed to use when referring to other White men who don't agree with you.
Johnny has already used "White Supremacist" and "Bigot" so that leaves what?
"Spewing Hatred", "Holocaust Denier", "Inbred Redneck".
When you get permission from your masters down at the university to use "White Man's Lingo" let me know and I'll oblige you with a discussion.
It's sad, really sad, you guys have lost your language, your identity, your BALLS, you are literally neutered, domesticated animals.
You just want a quiet life with no conflict, no confrontations and heaven forbid that you'd ever step out of line and get "Angry".
What's the point of "diversity" if it comes at such a price?
Migrants have the balls to say "This is MINE", "This is what I want", "This is where I'm going". "I claim this for my sons".
When your sons are standing cap in hand at the counter of McDonalds begging some Indian manager for the chance to flip burgers so they can feed their kids for another week, all because you didn't have the guts to say "This is mine", what are you going to tell them?