UOG! Talking through my butt! lol. and that's the best you'll got! Well' thank-you. I talk out of my butt quite often. smile.

TTm

Dear Oliver,

Thanks for the compliment which I ma happy to reciprocate. I too find exchange of opinion with atheists like you - or e.g. david f - more rewarding than with those I once described as “runner’s mirror images in the atheist camp”.

ttm i will repeat

you are putting up links..that say nothing..
its time you were more scientific...

stating/SPECIFICLY..
this link says../what!

but you have/been decieved..for so long...
you dont dare egsamin that you think/..the proof..
mainly because/you dont got none..or dont get that/you got

as repeatedly revealed/evoltion is an intra genus phenomina
NO CHANGE OF GENUS..has been reported..NOR observed...EVER

yet we blisfully educate the children ...into the godless/placeabo

you blindly follow a doctrin..of nature/..selecting
when clearly nature is more to do with creator's nurture
TO CLAIM SCIENCE...dont be claiming nature=science method

you talk of survival of the fittest
yet fail to see the joke...
that your science is..ensuring the sick survive..purely for finantial gain

[science studies the sick...not the healthy
..to find out/why they arnt sick...
its not amasing that some die...but so many/dont get sick at all

ANYHOW...you claim science proof
give up/some specific fact!
name the first''evolution'

replicate..the method...make just one new genus..[change but one cold/blood creature...into a warmblood...creature]

state definitivly..that what science/
link..or scientist..
says this or that..be specific....

if science fact
present the FACT

time you put some research..into that/you take/took..on faith!

making absurd claims...science done it..is nutts
if you cant present this....science
you got a belief in a theory

just like/this..^..debate on dimentions
[i gave the links/to the other dimentions...
looosly called heaven/hell...

yet THOSE CLAIMING/science
..wont explore...or rebut...
PREFERING TO REMAIN IGNORANT?
or with theory...cause the fact...so frightens..their theories/

faith in the godheads of their theories
by any-other name=faith..not science
present your faulsifyables

ahhh-men

Dear Oliver,

Silly me! The muddled up sentence:

“For instance, a four dimensional non-compact manifold admits a Lorentzian metric (entering Einstein’s GR) iff its Euler characteristic is 0“

should have read:

“For instance, a four dimensional non-compact manifold ALWAYS admits a Lorentzian metric (entering Einstein’s GR) a COMPACT one iff its Euler characteristic is 0“.

Quite right, George, I was about to pick you up on that :-)

Squeers,
I thought by now only Oliver and I were following this thread, so I am pleasantly surprised I was wrong. Actually no, I inserted that error and its correction on purpose to find out whether you were reading :-)))