The Forum > Article Comments > Intelligent design: scientifically and religiously bankrupt > Comments
Intelligent design: scientifically and religiously bankrupt : Comments
By Michael Zimmerman, published 14/5/2010From both a scientific and a religious perspective, intelligent design is dead and buried.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 55
- 56
- 57
-
- All
<<I'm actually willing and able to admit that, scientifically, I'm not capable of assessing the evidence for evolution and intelligent design beyond a very basic level...>>
I’m not sure what you’re getting at here, because the evidence for evolution is so over-whelming and abundant; and the evidence for creationism so completely absent, that a basic level of understanding is all that is required to make an informed decision. Anyone not capable of doing so would have to have a thinking disorder that was bordering on mental retardation.
So most of us here are not in that boat...
<<I suspect that many of you are in the same boat...except for the admission part ;-).>>
...and neither are you.
I’ll give you a little hint: Everything in nature supports evolution and nothing contradicts it, while there is not the slightest shred of evidence for creationism.
Not one little bit.
<<I tentatively agree with the idea that A harmonious relationship between theology and evolution can be achieved.>>
Personally, I disagree and that’s one of the main reasons I could no longer remain a Christian.
I simply couldn’t continue to believe in a god that would create everything in a way that made it look as though he didn’t need to exist (and on this level, I can sympathise with creationists) and then punish people for not believing, just as I couldn’t continue to believe in a god that documented his ‘word’ in a way that didn’t appear to need him to exist either.
Notice too that god only helps those that help themselves?
Funny that.
Nope, in a world were god apparently doesn’t need to exist for anything, I just couldn’t keep believing.
Of course, you get those who claim that science and religion answer two different questions - one is the ‘how’ and the other is the ‘why’ - but what these people don’t realise is that religion doesn’t answer, or even help to answer the ‘why’ - it only asserts it.