Attention, ladies, lefties & Howler,

"A NEW SIEGFRIED LINE IN THE BATTLE AGAINST FEMINISM"

Militant lesbians, feminists & other careerist gun molls of the FRG's ideological system have recently won, one of the last battles in a war they are going to lose. A news presenter of the broadcasting corporation, NDR who in books, had expressed old truths about the role of women, was pushed into quitting her employment. IE, something "politically correct", in order to defend the "incorrect", the wage labour of mothers & wives.

The struggle of the sexes & the struggle of the races are, auxiliary fronts of class struggle. The ideological political apparatus of the Capitalist class drives women into the labour market in order to break the labour market power of the proletarian man. The importation of foreign & racially alien labour forces serves the same purpose.

In order to understand that feminization, foreignization & enforced racial mixing are but weapons of the Capitalist class in its struggle against the proletarian class, one only needs to apply the law of supply & demand to the labour force market. The Family wage of the proletarian family provider & thus the "ETHICAL LIFE" can no longer be sustained, due to the oversupply of unmarried female & foreign labour on the domestic labour market.

Extra domestic female wage labour is at first a temporary expedient of the family & later becomes the bad habit of self debasement. The Men's honour, which forbids them from sending their wives to foreign people to work, becomes irrelevant & disappears. The matrimonial & family status is itself ousted by the unmarried status, the end is given with the status of the wretchedness of the single mothers & now the pauperisation of the German people under Capitalist foreign rule.

The childless women currently chancellorising the FRG personifies in a special way the imminent death of the German people & the failed existence of women in general, combined with a typical state/parasitical double wage of the regime's functionary couples, which puffs itself up as emancipation.

http://www.reich4.de/Begriffe/sittlichkeit/?lang=en

... Feminism committed the first & fundamental betrayal of Dutschkism (IE, the revolutionary seizure of the world in 1968). FEMINISM WAS THE MOTHER OF ALL WEST GERMAN, COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS. For a revolutionary it is not classes, or races, or women who make revolutions, but the peoples. "Revolutions are not made by a party, but by a whole people" wrote Karl Marx (MEW 34, 514).

After feminism had stabbed the ideals of the 1968 generation in the back & had severed the masculine, virile aspect of the people as the historical & revolutionary subject, the social-democratic, Communist traditionalists again dared to raise their heads in the guise of the professional revolutionaries, or cadres, of the 1970's.

The working class was again declared the revolutionary subject, even though it continued to dwindle. In the 1980's the Conservatives & Liberals took the initiative of the counter-revolutionary class struggle & surmounted themselves in the economic bubbles of the 1990's where capital began to comprehend itself as a permanent revolution & the business economist played the revolutionary in the role of the global omni-destroyer.

The emancipatory, anti-racist & anti-national politics of capital, now not only destroyed the natural ethical life of the families & the corporate ethical life of the civil societies, but also the actual ethical life of the states & nations.

But the Dutschkistic strategy has been proven right. In the late capitalism, the unemployment of the masses has become the principal social characteristic, for in addition to the "state class", over 40% of the population of the FRG are currently living off the transfer system & thus belong to the "anarchistic class". Today, civil society is no longer mainly possession-civil (factors property & capital) & no longer qualification-civil (factor labour) but post proletarian uncommanded, IE, anarchic.

The common feature of the post 1968 counter-revolutions was the division of the people -as subject of the revolution- into gender or classes. All strategies of the counter-revolution therefore always amount to a civil war, at least in the ideology & politics.

...West German feminism was the pace setter which paved the way for the infiltration of Capitalism into the families in a particularly insidious fashion with its demand for paid house work & thus hindered the procreation & natural rearing of uncountable numbers of children.

It is not without reason that the "epitome of man" in its historically, highest perfection is the human male. High cultures come into being only through the dominance of the man over woman & child, over kith & kin, clan & people.

Cultural decay always goes hand in hand with an advance of matriarchy & a recession of patriarchy. In the animal kingdom matriarchies occur predominantly in the lower classes & become increasingly rare with evolutionary progression.

The relationship of gender & family does not belong to the indirect sphere of the state & civil society, but is direct, natural ethical life -the kingdom of paternal rule- which is the foundation of all human circumstances derived from it.

Here, the women have never the less, more to say than the men, whose achievements for the "fatherland" are still appraised in the "mother-tongue".

http://www.reich4.de/Begriffe/sittlichkeit/?lang=en

Howler, you have to admit even an "evil male genius" at the black arts of sarcastic, wit could not have dreamed this stuff up? ROFL

Squeers, pynchme, I'm sorry, you were correct all along, it always was an evil plan for world domination by the capitalist/chauvinist pig/dogs. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled program...

The debate between Vanna and Fragmachine is fascinating. The old veteran versus the new generation man. Both are correct to a degree.

Believe it or not, Vanna, today's youth are far less concerned about traditional feminist issues. I recently witnessed a debate between 2nd generation and 3rd generation feminists. The younger women spoke the language of needing to have a career, support themselves, and not be dependent on a man. The older women spoke the language of victim hood entitlement, and patriarchy. So I think we ARE seeing a generational change such that FRAG sees feminist points in his textbook as fringe elements or social commentary.

However, FRAG also sees "equality of choice" as the just outcome in the gender wars. To a large degree, women DO have equality of choice in Australia (e.g. no one is stopping them entering any uni course for which they have the grades). What FRAG may not realize is that the agenda of feminism revolves more around "equality of outcomes". Thus, women earn less than men - not because they made different choices but because the patriarchy (aka the great masculine conspiracy) unconsciously forces them to make the wrong choices (this is the false consciousness bit they grabbed from Marxism). We seem the same rhetoric around the lack of women CEOs and Heads of State.

Many feminists would agree that enforcing quotas is the way to go to achieve "equality" just as Marxists would seize the resources of the wealthy and redistribute them. (Note: have you noticed feminists only want the desirable jobs - you don't hear many calls for quotas in coal mining or front line combat troops)

Stev,
To gain a full perspective about patriachy, how about feminists (including male or female feminists) build most of what is built, invent most of the inventions, grow most of the food, supply most of the music, make most of the films, write most of the text books, develop most of the software, make most of the discoveries, develop most of the sports, do most of the work, and pay most of the personal income tax.

I wonder how society will cope, (or if anyone will survive).