The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > East Anglia Climate Science Exonerated > Comments

East Anglia Climate Science Exonerated : Comments

By Geoff Davies, published 21/4/2010

Accusations of fraud or scientific misconduct have been widespread. The committee considered that if there had been misconduct they would very likely have found it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
and Mr Rudd's comment about climate change being the biggest moral challenge of the century has also been exonerated? No doubt he will remember this again when Mr Obama visits (if he has not got anything more important to do like last time he was scheduled to come).
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 3:11:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Your results are only as good as your data. Phil Jones's main mistake was taking the data on trust because he WANTED to, instead of double-checking it for precisely that reason.

So how good IS the global surface temperature data? Apart from the disappearance of 80% of the stations, the urban heat island effect and all those minus signs in the wrong places?

http://tinyurl.com/y5a66y2

Gee, maybe Canada and Finland didn't have a balmy tropical winter after all...
Posted by Jon J, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 3:42:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ahhh, I see Jon J, that epitome of science FUD ... Anthony Watts' (ex-weatherman extraordinaire) very own blogsite - way to go maaate :)
Posted by qanda, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 4:34:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
phoenix94, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:17:37 PM

Good onya Mate stick it right into them .

I doubt a conversion is likely , they are fanatics , like Religious Monks .
Just imagine trying to convince a Monk that Jesus was actually Karl Sandilands uncle in drag.
Posted by Garum Masala, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 5:03:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Loudmouth
relevance?

Hasbeen
Who was that aimed at?

Qanda
Some times I hope Mrs Brown (Monty Python galaxy song fame)found some out there hey.
;-)
Posted by examinator, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 5:29:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"....although their earlier methods might have exaggerated some effects in the so-called “hockey stick” graph (the subject of heated debate) which depicts temperatures over the past thousand years based on tree-ring data."

The scary thing about the Hockey Stick graph is that Mann only used selected tree ring data which suited his intended outcome. Using ALL the tree ring data we get an entirely different graph.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/28/a-look-at-treemometers-and-tree-ring-growth/

Secondly, basic Science tells us that tree ring growth is related to more than just temperature. e.g. rainfall etc so can be wildly out in years of low rainfall.

Surely, any thinking person would see that AGW is deeply flawed? Not if you are ideologically committed to the cause. Logic, then makes no headway.
Posted by Atman, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 9:19:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy