The Forum > Article Comments > Seven key facts about the Vatican, the Pope and child sexual abuse by Catholic clergy > Comments
Seven key facts about the Vatican, the Pope and child sexual abuse by Catholic clergy : Comments
By Ben Mathews, published 22/4/2010Recent comments from Vatican officials in the wake of child sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic Church, and the reporting of them, call for some clarification of key concepts to inform public debate and policy responses.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
First, I should have made it clear that I am not attempting to defend any paedophile, or any other person who has sexually abused a child. My reason for writing this piece is to clarify some ideas so the real reasons for clergy sexual abuse of children (and women) can be identified (and not explained away as ‘paedophilia’), and so the Catholic Church cannot claim it can end the clergy sexual abuse crisis by eradicating ‘paedophilia’.
Second, you’ve drawn my attention to the need to give more detail about my conclusion that most cases of clergy sexual abuse of children are not technically ‘paedophilia’ (due to word limits, I could not write everything):
1. Dr Lothstein, who has treated hundreds of Catholic priests, states ‘I’ve only seen a handful of men who’ve actually been genuine paedophiles, when you use that term correctly’;
2. Recall that paedophilia involves activity with only prepubertal children, and the average age of onset of puberty in boys is about 11.5, and in girls it is about 10.9 (see eg Parent et al, “The Timing of Normal Puberty’ (2003) 24(5) Endocrine Reviews 668-693, p 670-672);
3. In light of this, and if you read the John Jay report, Tables 3.5.5 and 3.5.6, you’ll see the figures provided for the age groups indicate strongly that: (a) those aged 15-17 are almost certainly not ‘genuine paedophilia’; (b) most of those in the 11-14 age group are probably not ‘genuine paedophilia’; (c) these two groups are 78.2% of all the cases where this question was answered; (d) some and possibly most cases in the 8-10 age group may be ‘genuine paedophilia’, but even some of these may not be (eg if the child was not pre-pubertal); and (e) those in the age 1-7 group (the smallest group by far) are far more likely the victims of ‘genuine paedophilia’.
4. These tables show a strong decline over time in victims in the 1-7 and 8-10 age groups, and an overall increase in victims in the 15-17 year age group.