The Forum > Article Comments > Childhood — a time of innocence and indoctrination > Comments
Childhood — a time of innocence and indoctrination : Comments
By Glen Coulton, published 23/4/2010Is requiring children to adopt the religious beliefs of their parents not akin to child abuse?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
- All
Most religious families will raise their children within that doctrine. Most are moderates and the children will also experience life outside the home through school, media and friends. From there teens will sort out in their own minds whether or not they will follow the religion of their parents.
What is practised within the home should be a matter for parents as long as there is no acutal child abuse related to religious practices eg. such as severe beatings to rid of the devil, and other such maniacal nonsense. There is also a thin line in relation to blood transfusions and similar beliefs that may lead to the death of a child who has no power in the decision making process. That is where the line gets a bit tricky from a legal aspect - religious rights vs right to life.
Teaching religion is not akin to child abuse. Children are raised in all manner of families including hippy communes, middle class surburbia, socialist, right wing, farming life etc. No matter the character of the family, children generally grow up and decipher the many mixed messages for themselves.
Religion is a matter for the home, rather it there than used as a mass indoctrination exercise in public schools, where at least in a secular society, children benefit from experiencing opposing opinions and can determine there are many paths and what they know from the homefront is just one.