JAY,

ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI WHITE.

Ain’t that the truth.. “Oh the games people play …every night and every day ….never saying what they mean and never meaning what they say”

SILENT WHISPERER - Back up a minute before you put the blame for Cronulla on the Australians.

The Muslims had been hanging around that beach causing trouble for quite a while baiting the Australians and sexually harassing the girls. Could the reason they were sexually harassing the girls be because of their belief that women who weren’t dressed in Muslim attire were not living by the rules of the Muslim culture and therefore should be treated with disrespect. Of course the main aim of the game was just to bait the different ethnic group on the beach. The aboriginal gangs play that game up here all the time when they want to beat white people up, they start hurling filthy insults at the female in couples walking by because they know the man or men in the group will try to defend them.

They were chatted by a lifeguard for their behaviour, and promptly beat him up. Again an act of aggressive, provoking behaviour. The Australians present reacted with anger and promptly told the
Muslim HOOLIGANS to go back where they came from(Arab Countries) if they couldn’t act with decency and respect towards the Australian way of life on the beaches.

The Australians however never sought revenge after the incident as the Muslims did, racing back to their community and coming back with 20car loads of Muslims and going on a revenge spree on the innocent people and their families in the town near the Cronulla beach most of whom were not even at the beach or involved in the incident, even murdering an innocent bystander in the process.

"The ONLY purpose of promoting assimilation of White people is to cause the eradication of those White skinned people."

Where is your evidence for this?

"The purpose of Third world immigration is to facilitate the eradication of White people and many on this board support it."

Really? Prove it? I thought these people were seeking a better life.

"Being against Racism and being pro White are not mutually exclusive"

So why say derogatory things about Halle Berry and other non-whites?

Cherful:
"The Muslims had been hanging around that beach causing trouble for quite a while baiting the Australians and sexually harassing the girls."

I think the Muslims are Australians ;-)

David, Leftism and Assimilationism depend entirely on one’s current opinion. A Leftist loves or hates according to his current feeling about a group from one set of words against another set of words. He HATES Evil, as he defines Evil according to his Leftist outlook.

So whoever he is currently criticizing, best of all if it has the virtue of being his own group, he currently Hates, because they are Evil on the only scale he knows.

The Leftist assumes the same motivation in others. To him, Hate is the basic motivation.
Loyalty is the most natural motivation for any animal above the level of a cockroach. Meer Kats hate other groups of Meer Kats during the period they are competing with them. Over tens of millions of years of years of evolution, there has never been a social animal who judged all others of his species objectively.

Leftists are very unnatural animals. What passes for loyalty in them is whether a group represents Good or Evil. Someone who is wrong is not just wrong, it is Hate of all things that are Good. No healthy minded person can think that way. He loves his family and knows what is right and wrong about them. THE LOYALTY DOES NOT VARY.

It is inevitable that the Leftist sees the world in terms of Hate versus Love, of Good versus Evil.

To a person with a healthy mind, this is a very sick way to look at things.

Jay of Melbourne: << Being against Racism and being pro White are not mutually exclusive. >>

There in a nutshell is your problem, Jay. Only under a truly perverse definition of racism could such a statement be true. The rest of your garbled nonsense seems to flow from that, so would you mind providing a definition of what you take the social phenomenon of 'racism' to be?

<< To a person with a healthy mind, this is a very sick way to look at things. >>

And how do you know this, exactly? Do you regard yourself as "a person with a healthy mind"

DAVID JENNINGS : re-sexual harrassment of girls on beaches <I think the Muslims are Australians>

There is flirty good natured sexual harrassment and then there is nasty put down sexual harrassment, In any case the Muslim males at the very least showed poor judgement in their actions. It would be the same as a group of Cronulla males going into Muslim areas and openly sexually harassing Muslim women.

If you had half and ounce of sense you wouldn’t do it without expecting some kind of confrontation with the locally present males.

Belting a lifeguard would be considered a low class act by most Australians even if it was done by a white person because the lifeguards volunteer their time to protect peoples lives at the beaches. It would be equivalvent to a white person going in and belting the local Iman in his mosque. Anyway lifeguards usually don’t tell somebody to behave unless it is really necessary.

This is a case of cocky Muslim males trying to throw their weight around in an Australian cultural situation When they got their arses kicked by the crowd metaphorically speaking, they did what all cowards do,they raced back to blame the whites for the trouble and brought the whole gang back for revenge. We see that sort of behaviour a lot lately at private parties where gatecrashers causing trouble are asked to leave and they come back with a gun or a few friends to get revenge for a situation they caused in the first place.

Riots on beaches are something practically unheard of in Australia so something must have been done to provoke the situation that happened on that beach that day. Australians are famously laidback and relaxed when they go to the beach. They have shared those beaches with immigrants from, everywhere for years why do they suddenly attack a group of muslim boys unless there was a lot of provocation?

You're all missing the point. We aren't truly representative. I mean, even with news reporters who are non-Anglo, they are still Anglo in speech, values, and you can tell they are assimilated.

If we were truly mulitucultural, we'd have an Arab guy doing the news an a hijab woman next tom him.

Also, we'd tolerate cock-fighting which is rife in Asian community, or dog fighting which is rife in Yugoslav community.

It's not necessary anyway, as in a society like ours, or the US, or UK, or any Anglo country, anyone can become anything. In fact, some of my friends who are from minorities (in truth, the Anglo is in the minority in Australia) laugh about how much easier it will be for them to get a job when they finish uni than me, due to diversity policies of most law firms.

It really is pathetic how bad it is. ANGLOS are the most tolerant people on earth, yet these minorities are all from filthy, racist cultures, illiberal to the bone.

I don't care about different coloured news readers, but shows about Lebanese Muslims would be dumb. Especially because it would not be accurate, I mean, it would probably be about how they suffer racism or something rather than the truth that they drive around in carloads bashing skips for fun.

You people have absolutely no idea.