Barnaby gives us country folk HOPE.
Currently we are governed by theoretical genius' who operate from ivory towers in Capiatal cities.
1. In 1981 the ALP Cain Government in Victoria banned fuel reuction burning. In 1998, 2003, 2005,05,07 and 09 bushfires of intensive heat incinerated around 3 million ha of Victoria and reduced water flow from those forests. The flora and fauna stood no chance of suvival.
2. An agreement between Cape York indigenous people and the Government was ignored when The Wilderness Society wanted to turn the Wild Rivers area into a Wilderness, depriving the Indigenous people of the right to determine traditional land use.
3. The ALP have decided that, against all scientific rational advice that CO2 is now a pollutant. They want to introduce a tax to remove it. You breath it out every breath you take.

I hope that before the next election rural folk awaken and at the election kick the major political parties right where it hurts most. In the ballot box.
Lets get rid of political correctness and make politicians respond to what we elected them for. One of (much maligned) Barnaby Joyce's utterances was that he was elected to represent his electorate and thats what he would do. He has done it in spades.

A pox on global warming alarmists. Barnaby Joyce.
Lets hear the truth for once. Barnaby Joyce.
Let the Government confuse itself with its high falluting gobbledy gook. Lets listen to Barnaby Joyce.

Barnaby is right about the debt.In our oligarcical sytem,there is very little difference between public and private debt.Kevin Rudd has totally over reacted in his spending spree.

It is the international banking system who are the real parasites.They create money from nothing and put countries into a debt spiral from which they cannot escape.

Barnaby is beginning to to speak home truths whom many feel affronted.

IN THE END IT WAS BARNABY'S CHOICE
So we have those outraged,
By truths so rare,
Debt is debt,
And we as it's slaves,
Do not dare,
To confront the truth,
That Barnaby espouses,

Do we dare,do we dare,
Comprehend this puny verse?
Nay,not so,
Just let the ether of delusion,
Divert our attention,
To the terse.

Stark ravenly perverse.

Odo,
What is it you are saying I'm confused are you saying you believe climate change is happening but not the Anthropomorphic part?
BTW there is a difference between a sceptic (Aussie spelling) and a denier.
A true sceptic continues to look not close up mental shop and develop a siege mentality, grasping at any theory so long as it is anti AGW.
And when asked why all the prestige institutions and the bulk of working scientists agree, with the thrust of AGW. The answer is either mass delusion or a sinister conspiracy.

Personally, I examine all, theories I come across asking does it better explain, all, the observable facts ?

So far Plimer and Monckton's theories leave great slabs of unexplained provable events/data, that AGW (spit I hate that term as it's misleading.) does.

But back to Barney, I'm a real sceptic, I clearly said that he's not dumb. I'm just not convinced he's anything more that a cynical opportunist like Tony, the mad monk. I don't believe there is any moral virgins in parliament, given our corrupt(able)ed Party system.
In short a pox on all their houses.

Well, well, well, I had no idea that old Barnaby, & Tony had them so worried.

There would not be so many, & they would not bother with such a vitriolic attack, if they were not worried.

Shades of Howard, really, after he had shoved them out into the wilderness.

What fun.

Examinator, you appear confused about Plimer and Monckton. They rightfully point out that climate change is a natural process, and hence do not need to push any climate change theory. They, like Barnaby and Tony incidentally, are climate change realists.

Odo,
Steady on! The thread is about Barnaby Joyce - not AGW.

My point is that he says one thing to the media while doing the opposite.

He claimed to be a believer in AGW on TV but was also physically escorting "an expert" around venues within his electorate to speak out against the concept of AGW. That's what I call sponsorship.

That's also the dishonesty I was referring to or is it just harmless political opportunism?