Jayb,
As I’ve indicated, I suspect you are a criminal, of the mentally twisted parasitic description, for if you weren’t you may not be defending the indefensible behaviour of your associate ozzie so fervently. The other indicators are your base descriptions of bodily functions as metaphor, and your use of terms alike “whitie.“

Definitions I utilise may be incomprehensible to you owing to your level of illiteracy, for I not only use the terms and spell them correctly, unlike dysfunction you demonstrate, I comprehend what the terms mean.

Your attempts to impress me are pathetic, for as is known, the feature of the pretensions of would be criminal tough guys, is their crippling mental dysfunction, that realises the incapacity derived of their irrational and impulsive behaviour, to get out of their own way.

Apparent is your obsessive hatred of anyone with different views to you, that demonstrates the dysfunction of your racist malaise. Keep coming Jayb, I’m confident Police would be eager to reacquaint themselves with you and your ‘mates.’

And no, I’m not a bigot alike you, I just object to parasitic racist creeps alike you, for your racism is comprehensively and unredeemably destructive, a bane upon prospective civilised society.

JayB a crime is a racist crime when it is committed, in part, because of the race of the victim.

So if I attack an Asian and make anti-Asian comments in the course of that assault then it would be a racist crime.

But if I attack somebody of another race, that doesn't make it racist by itself. There needs to be something else that clearly marks it out as a crime motivated by racism. Really, I have to say something racist.

For example, the rapes committed by Bilal Skaf were race hate crimes. Because Skaf said he was attacking the girls because they were 'skips' and they were being attacked 'Leb style.' That is clearly a race crime.

Whether court gets it right or the media reports it properly is another question.

So when Ozzie reports crime by Indians and suggests that they are racist crimes he's not being honest. Really Ozzie and Ngarmada are mirror images of each other. Both have an agenda against a particular group because they feel slighted by that group.

Ngarmada, I'm not sure who Dennis is. But I'm pretty sure that JayB is NOT a racist and he's NOT a criminal. I'm not sure if I'm a colonialist either.

Again David tries to twist the truth. The sad little poorly paid academic, that just can't make it in the real world. Now he states I have portrayed these attacks by Indians as racist. I have done no such thing.

David stated...

" So when Ozzie reports crime by Indians and suggests that they are racist crimes he's not being honest."

What I actually stated was quite the opposite. In an earlier post I said...

" Tonight another murder by an Indian. Now 4 out of the last 5 Indians murdered in Australia have been committed by Indians. Still this case was constantly presented in the media as being a racist Australian attack. Keep the Multicultural propaganda coming. I no longer believe a word of it. I wonder how the politically correct Multiculturalists will try to twist this story around. Surely it must somehow be the fault of a white Australian."

So its actually David who is being dishonest. People such as David and the other politically correct multiculturalists have tried to paint these crimes as committed by Anglo Australians, mostly by refusing to tell the full story and state who the attackers are. Such people do not like it when the truth comes out and it is found that the attackers are actually from the same migrant group.

At least I got into uni the first time around ;-)

And just quietly, I think I'm making a fair bit more than you are.

Not that it matters to me. I didn't bring up salaries etc.

David the little lying child. Trying to deflect the conversation when your lies have been found out. You really have not accounted for your comment..

David said...

" So when Ozzie reports crime by Indians and suggests that they are racist crimes he's not being honest."

What I actually stated was quite the opposite. In an earlier post I said...

" Tonight another murder by an Indian. Now 4 out of the last 5 Indians murdered in Australia have been committed by Indians. Still this case was constantly presented in the media as being a racist Australian attack. Keep the Multicultural propaganda coming. I no longer believe a word of it. I wonder how the politically correct Multiculturalists will try to twist this story around. Surely it must somehow be the fault of a white Australian."

So yes David, these were not racist crimes committed by Anglo Australians as you and your promulticulturalism friends try desperately to make out. Trying to make ordinary Australians feel guilty for these crimes. These were committed by Indians, no matter how much spin you try to put on it.

David also said...

" And just quietly, I think I'm making a fair bit more than you are.

Not that it matters to me. I didn't bring up salaries etc."

Well unless you have some type of employment outside the Uni system you will not be earning anything like I do, because you and everyone else knows academics are paid poorly. i doubt there would by any academic on much above 200K.

Also it actually was you that brought up salaries. Here's what you said above..

David said...

" There's no way you are a doctor - I hope you are enjoying life on the MEDIAN wage."

David if your going to try and misrepresent what I have said, are you so dumb as to not know that people can just scroll back and see who said what.