Ngarmada wrote

"I am accredited to an advanced level from a prestigious and leading Australian tertiary institution in this field."

Could it be the UNSW Law school?

You still haven't told us your qualifications Ozzie or what actually it is that you do for a living. Lucy thinks you are a nurse. I doubt that. My guess is that you sell medical insurance. You seem to have the level of compassion that corresponds with a private health insurance company.

I'm very curious. Its the great unanswered question of OLO.

CJ Morgan, to reiterate my comment in previous posts on this article; "you do not build bridges to killers." Dealing with thugs on their level is an exceedingly paternalistic and stupid strategy. Paternalism is part of their malaise.

Ozzie, your moniker is obviously taken from the racist Australian chant oi! Adopted from the racist and criminal skinhead movement in Britain, it is appropriate to your intellectual capacity, and intent. You may recall, a few years ago an insightful and acclaimed British investigative documentary demonstrated how the real agenda of that movement was covertly monopolised by a mere handful of criminals attempting to organise a criminal arm for their own personal benefit.

The documentary further demonstrated how easy it was to infiltrate them, following the adage, it is effective to con a con with a con.
Such is the limited ability of illegitimate intent to identify irrational thought.

This failure of ability is similar to your feeble attempts to identify the tertiary institution I was trained, however, it is my responsibility to advise you, your finding me is a truly unwise idea. As I would be similarly disappointed to find it necessary to find you.

That you are obviously au fait with criminality and its prison culture, I would advise you to reflect upon its remarkably consistent failure.

David wrote
"You still haven't told us your qualifications Ozzie or what actually it is that you do for a living"

There is a little button on your computer just to the right with an arrow pointing upwards (or away from you). Try pressing that a few times and you will see that I have in fact already given you the answer to both questions. I shouldn't have to repeat myself multiple times.

Ngarmada wrote
"This failure of ability is similar to your feeble attempts to identify the tertiary institution I was trained, however, it is my responsibility to advise you, your finding me is a truly unwise idea. As I would be similarly disappointed to find it necessary to find you."

and
"They are usually criminals, consistent with their mindset and psychosis, where their malignant desires feed their anxiety from their absence of self esteem. That obsession may be inflated on sites like these, that such sites allow them the delusion of intellectual parity, reinforcing their delusion of superiority, while coincidentally allowing them to peddle the malice of their malaise.

It is why they are drawn collectively as parasites to articles such as this, and the characteristic indicators that identifies them comprehensively"

I believe there is a new Windows program available which includes free spellcheck, grammar check, sentence construction check etc. I suggest you most expeditiously avail yourself of such, that is get one quickly and use it.

No you haven't ever answered the question. You've told us that you went to UNSW (so much for quality control) but not what you studied there and not what you actually do.

In fact you are very evasive on this point. You've made a claim about being a "medical practitioner" but that is a very broad field covering doctors, nurses, radiographers and even general hospital workers. We still don't have a straight answer.

I should also add Ozzie that you and Ngarmada do make rather a lovely pair. You should put on a public debate together it would draw quite a crowd.

I note the comments you make regarding grammar, style etc and I have often thought that they were equally applicable to your postings. I am slightly concerned by the tone of some of the recent posts, and I would call for restraint, but I guess that would again be ignored.