For a immigrant from some backward, dysfunctional Third World country, Australia surely is a land of opportunity. Australia offers them levels of wealth, security, freedom, education and comfort far beyond anything they could have ever hoped for back in their old countries. And, in return, Australia demands practically nothing. We give out our citizenship without demanding immigrants renounce their previous loyalties and citizenship. We not only allow, but actively encourage, newly-arrived immigrants to retain their old cultures and ethnic allegiances. We even provide them with taxpayer funds to establish their foreign enclaves on Australian soil. No wonder Third World immigrants are positive about Australia!

But what about the existing Australian population? What do they get out of mass immigration and multiculturalism?

Yes, immigration makes the immigrants themselves very happy. And yes, it makes big business very rich (immigration = cheaper labour and more consumers). But why would the citizenry, the ordinary Australians who are being disenfranchised and displaced, why would any of us favour immigration?

The author of this jejune article doesn't even bother to ask that question. In the mind of a career multiculturalist, if you belong to the Anglo-Celtic majority and are opposed to mass immigration or state-imposed multiculturalism, then by default you are a Hansonite, a xenophobe and a racist.

[Continued below...]

If Australia has seemingly become a land of opportunity for immigrant minorities, but not for members of the majority such as Pauline Hanson, I would argue that it probably has a lot to do with multiculturalism, particularly the way it has promoted the rights of new minorities at the expense of the old majority.

To quote Greg Clancy in “The Conspiracies of Multiculturalism”:

"Multiculturalism has divided the Australian population into two social groups – those who are predominantly of Christian descent and of generally Anglo-Saxon or Celtic ethnicity, and the multicultural group. Those belonging to the multicultural group have had a “special” status developed for them by multiculturalism. This status has accompanied the privilege of possessing cultural differences which, irrespective of their social suitability, are to be protected within the multicultural system."

Finally, as for the "myth" of monocultural Australia, it is worth reminding the likes of Rachel Woodlock and others that in 1949, Australia's population was 98 percent European, 90 percent Anglo-Celtic. Even as late as 1988, Australia was still over 90 percent European, 75 percent Anglo-Celtic. Compared to other settler societies, Australia was a relatively homogeneous country, racially and culturally. Yes, there were non-European minorities here, but their numbers were so small, and their contribution so inconsequential, that they were completely absent from mainstream Australian life.

Relentless are these insidious racists who persist in proliferating their maniacal racist views on academic comment such as in this article, in attempt to influence their perverse opinions qualifying their inherent right to rule the world, or at least Australia.

Alike Efranke, Blairbar, Andrew Bolt, and Piers Akerman, they hold no hesitation in attempting deception in misrepresentation of factual information, they determine that follows as justified, by their perceived unassailable sovereign right to decide exactly how and what all should think. For example, the comment of Efranke that by 1988 Australia was still 90% european, and 75% anglo celtic. It demonstrates the perversity of their dysfunction.

As is known of the record and history of such extreme malevolence for the purpose of vested interest, effectively they seek the sbservient submission of those they deem, by deception, they should be entitled to rule. And the reason they take the course of stealth to pursue that twisted aim, is their instinctive knowledge it is illegitimate, malevolent and perverse.

As the majority of all populations are aware, they are sick and require help. However their malady realises them, according to their destructive proclivities, a dangerous threat to all. That is, dangerous as the threat of a psychotic [for such malady is definitively psychosis], for if they were to retain the least shred of character and integrity, and challenge those they wish to submit to their slavery, they would be dispatched in very short order, and is why they attack by stealth.

Ngarmada, I was just wondering, judging by the style of your writing & expression, if you haven't been studying Mao's "Little Red Book"?

Ah yes, Jayb, I was wondering when you would turn up, with such certainty, its prediction is analogous of a maggot drawn to a corpse.

No, I hold no communist leanings, for when alike me Jayb, you are tained to the level I am in the science of management, you may transcend such flawed ideologies as communism, socialism, and capitalism. Then you may be able to utilise language terms as definitive forms of expression, although with malevolent, moronic, parasites, like you, I would not be confident.

For racists by definition, are by nature so dumb their intellect resembles single cell organisms, to the extent that if they were miraculously endowed with a second brain, it would be tragically lonely.

They are usually criminals, consistent with their mindset and psychosis, where their malignant desires feed their anxiety from their absence of self esteem. That obsession may be inflated on sites like these, that such sites allow them the delusion of intellectual parity, reinforcing their delusion of superiority, while coincidentally allowing them to peddle the malice of their malaise.

It is why they are drawn collectively as parasites to articles such as this, and the characteristic indicators that identifies them comprehensively

Why thank you for your generous compliments Ngarmada. I'm sorry I didnt mean to convey that you were a Communist/Socalist/Capitalist.

It was the flowery manner of expression & the mode of rhetoric espoused North Korea's Kim jong Il's News reader the other night on TV, that made me think of you. ;-)

In purely White Anglo/Saxon/Celtic/Australian vernacular. I just bet your students take the piss out of you.