The Forum > Article Comments > Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists > Comments
Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists : Comments
By Rachel Woodlock, published 17/2/2010While young Muslim Australians can positively appreciate Australia as a land of opportunity, Ms Pauline Hanson cannot.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
- All
Posted by CJ Morgan, Monday, 1 March 2010 7:14:21 AM
| |
CJ; I have consistently argued against the racists, xenophobes and Islamophobes of OLO for years.
Oh! CJ, you old hippy you. One of the beautiful flower people. Still living high on Love/Sex/Drugs. The swirling coloured lights are wonderful, arn't they, but watch out for when the spiders come out. CJ, not liking some aspect of someones particular behaviour doesn't make one racist/xenophobic/Islamophobic. It just means that you don't like that particular person or their particular behaviour. I suppose you love those grubs who live in filth & wreck their rented accomodation as much as indigenous,Gay & Islamic terrorist. Ahh, the power of the flower... All we need is love, love , love. XOXOXOXXX Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 March 2010 7:45:36 AM
| |
My point precisely CJ, is your obsession with the look and not the substance. You are obviously someone whom has never experienced racist vilification, but believe, alike these parasites, you retain a sovereign right to pontificate upon, and decide, such issues.
Many observers, alike you, without personal experience of these issues, view these posts reasonably, attributing credibility to both divides of the debate where they observe it. Unless these parasites are engaged to reveal their true agenda, the tactic and design of their deception is accepted by many as legitimate debate, its the modus operandi of these parasites. I trust you are getting an education, its not rocket science, even for pseudo liberal morons. For example, Jayb reveals himself once again with his apparent intimate knowledge of drug abuse. Posted by Ngarmada, Monday, 1 March 2010 9:02:17 AM
| |
Ngarmada wrote
" As exemplified of the banality of the latter post of CJ Morgan, it is my responsibility to spell out the alert to those naïve who post on these issues, of the insidious nature of the racists I refer to, and their criminal intent in attempting to identify your personal details by pseudo interrogative argument. For it has no relevance to critical analysis, but is an attempt to identify the individual, and their personal details, of those who post on these issues." I agree with your thoughts exactly. I too was getting concerned with CJs constant hounding for more personal information. It's really worrying and getting creepy. I have told these people my degrees and what I do for a living but they persist with their demands. It seems that CJ and her friend David want to focus on the man and not the ball. The points should be debated, not who is making those points. If CJ occasionally makes a good point (usually by luck) then CJ should be acknowledged even if CJ is poorly educated. That really doesn't matter. But the constant demand for more personal information, especially on a public website is creepy. I also think that CJ's comments about you especially this one CJ wrote " You seem to have your heart in the right place, but you do the cause of social justice no favours by your deployment of abusive, almost incomprehensible language that makes you look as bad as any bigot." are insulting. Don't worry about CJ, comments like this simply demonstrate the true person CJ is. Posted by ozzie, Monday, 1 March 2010 9:22:44 AM
| |
Oh! Ngarmada, just what are we going to do with you. Do you have some sort of inferiorty or supperiorty complex? I don't care either way.
I don't know which of the 4 basic races you belong to & personally, I don't careor want to know. Just because I believe that you have shown yourself to be a complete & utter d!c%he@d, & have voiced my opinion as to such, that doesn't mean I dislike your race as a whole, It just means you in particular. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 March 2010 9:24:02 AM
| |
I dont think it right to judge one's fitness as a human being by a few opinions expressed on an internet forum. Have a look at what happens when morality gets linked to action. Was "Raving Roland" convinced of his own morality and the immorality of the people he tried? If so, did such a view make him feel morally justified to treat these people inhumanely?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKOCmBXrVY8&feature=related The current appreciation of morality is measured by one's humanity to others, not a crusade to weed out those seen as morally inferior. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1084711/posts Posted by Fester, Monday, 1 March 2010 9:26:30 AM
|
If you have a look at my posting history, you might notice that I have consistently argued against the racists, xenophobes and Islamophobes of OLO for years. You may also notice that I use clear, unambiguous language with which to do so.
You seem to have your heart in the right place, but you do the cause of social justice no favours by your deployment of abusive, almost incomprehensible language that makes you look as bad as any bigot.