Shadow Minister,

I was simply asking for an explanation of your
remarks to Toni on page 1 of this discussion.
Your meaning wasn't quite clear in your second sentence.

The SSM issue was never about equality. If it was then marriage would have been made available to polygamists, related adult couples and polyamorous groups.

//The SSM issue was never about equality.//

No, it was all done just to upset you tories, because the whole world really does revolve around you.

Of course it was about equality. What else do you imagine it could have been about? Let me guess... some far-fetched conspiracy theory. Because they're SO convincing. [sarcasm]

//If it was then marriage would have been made available to polygamists, related adult couples and polyamorous groups.//

Non-sequitur.

To continue to say no to SSM in the name of Conservative Christians was to do so in the name of a God that never existed.
Just maybe we should consider why we let any God and those who follow them have any impact on our law and life

Big Nana,

It’s good to have a sensible woman on OLO. You remind us that all women are not like that fright, Foxy. Perhaps she is not really a woman. I have certainly never come across another such unpleasant and nagging version of the fair sex anywhere.

Belly,

Are you really that ignorant that you are unaware that our ‘laws’ and ‘life’ exist only because of the Judeo-Christian ethic? And not every objector to SSM is a conservative or a Christian. Many homosexuals themselves think the concept is ridiculous and the last thing they would have any dealings with. Your life experience seems to be very limited. Did you not know that 95% of same sex couples have ignored the "experts" and the chatterti and not married?

try to be nice, it is time!I will no longer respond to your insulting trolling