James, in fact I only came back to this post because of the Conspiracy Theory thread. I was going to give this thread as an example to Forest, until I realised they were deep in discussion with your various selves on the thread. At that point I realised Forest would be sufficiently immersed in conspiracy theories for me to bother pointing one out.

In answer to your question, I answered all that here http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2166&page=0#46440

When you have read and digested these academic works you will understand the point I made.

Happy reading.

Actually James, I don't think I will.

I prefer to laugh at what a monumental waste of time and money you have spent.

I will encourage you to contest the next election though, and the one after that, as I like to see all the success that you have garnered through your persistence.

Bugsy wrote, "Actually James, I don't think I will."

I'm not sure whether this means that you will continue to fail to seriously respond on this forum to the case of the 9/11 Truth Movement or whether you intend not to tell me why my case for standing for elections was unsound.

In either case, I am not surprised, but I don't particularly mind.

---

Agronomist,

Providing a list of supposedly authoritative documents and telling me to go off to read them is no answer the to the case I have put.

If they are the refutation of the case of the 9/11 Truth movement as you claim they are, then you would have been able to refer to those documents in order to show where the truthers on this forum are wrong, but you have not.

US high school physics teacher David Chandler has demonstrated that the NIST 'explanations' of the WTC 7 collapse were wrong and that WTC 7 fell at free fall speed for the first 2.5 seconds. Even NIST was forced to admit he was right as the second broadcast, of those listed below, shows.

The only way this could have have happened was if the 'collapse' was in fact a controlled demolition as even the new reporter on the day comment at the end of the first broadcast.

So, how about sharing with us your own comprehension of those weighty tomes and telling us why David Chandler is wrong?

---

"WTC7 in Freefall" at http://911blogger.com/node/17685
"'WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall' ...The Movie" at http://911blogger.com/node/18771
"WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)" at http://911blogger.com/node/18951
"WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)" at http://911blogger.com/node/18969

(also listed at http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2166&page=75#54219)

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2009_03_25_9_11_victims__kin_seek_release_of_secret_documents/srvc=home&position=also
http://911blogger.com/node/19690

9/11 VICTIMS' KIN SEEK RELEASE OF SECRET DOCUMENTS
3/25/2009

Three families who lost loved ones in the 9/11 terrorist attacks head to court today to plead with a federal judge to release a million pages of documents detailing the mass murder of nearly 3,000 Americans.

Those secret papers, one Bay State family member told the Herald, are “so bad you won’t believe it.”

“It was out control,” Paul Keating, 45, said of security on Sept. 11, 2001, including at Logan International Airport in Boston where two ill-fated jets left on a collision course with infamy.

“My mother went through the most public murder you could imagine . . . and I’ve been putting up with this crap for seven years,” Keating said of his refusal to settle his case out of court.

Keating’s 72-year-old mother, Barbara, a Framingham native, died aboard American Airlines [AMR] Flight 11.

Keating is making legal history today, along with the families of Mark Bavis, 31, and Sara Low, 28, by asking Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Federal District Court in Manhattan to lift the order keeping all the evidence hidden.

Low was a Boston-based flight attendant on Flight 11; Bavis of West Newton, a passenger on United Airlines Flight 175. Both jets left Logan with hijackers on board and were slammed into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers.

“Sept. 11 should not have happened,” said attorney Donald A. Migliori, whose firm represents all three families.

He said the secret papers include depositions of former Massport Executive Director Virginia Buckingham and former Logan security chief Joe Lawless.

If the documents are released, plans are in the works to make a public archive.

As for the three families, they vow to hold out for public trials next year - refusing any share of $7 billion in secret settlements to expose how 19 terrorists brought a nation to its knees.

Still channelling my late ex-mother-in-law I see, Jimmy.

Why don't you admit it, Christopher?

You don't have a clue about 9/11, do you?

Whoever it is, to whom you defer in order to find out what think on any difficult question, has told you that anyone who questions Bush's word on the September 11 attacks, or who sees anything suspicious in the assassinations of JFK, Malcolm X and RFK is a fruit loop conspiracy nut, and that has settled the issue for you, hasn't it?

---

I have posted some further comments on my election campaign in the forum in response to my article "How the Growth Lobby threatens Australia's future" at http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=8485&page=11#137963

Anyone who wants to explain why my reasons for stand were unsound is still welcome to say so, either there or at http://candobetter.org/QldElections