The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Is it all over for Mitt Romney? > Comments

Is it all over for Mitt Romney? : Comments

By Nick Sharman, published 25/9/2012

When it comes to personal narrative Mitt mispeaks all the time.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Its interesting that many people would rather have an incompetent nice guy than a good manager they don't like. Apart from redistributing income, which cannot stimulate job growth, Obama has no economic plan. Yet Romney fails to impress because he doesn't have a celebrity style personality and is 'wealthy', which is apparently only acceptable if you are a Democrat.
Posted by Atman, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 9:15:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Obama did/does have a plan! Unfortunately, it has been endlessly blocked and or sabotaged, by a republican controlled congress.
Who then have the hide to turn and blame Obama, for the lack of progress.
In simple economic terms, one cannot grow the economy by shrinking the very things that underpin and support it!
Things like discretionary spending, which reduces the inventory on the shop shelves, which in turn reduces the inventory stacked in warehouses, which in turn then demand the wheels of manufacture and commerce to begin to turn once again!
Creating jobs, wealth, opportunity and more taxpayers paying tax, in the process.
In purely scientific terms, it is called he law of cause and effect!
The very last time we tried the tea party/conservative economic pie shrinking austerity, we forced around thirty percent of the population onto the dole queues.
And nobody but nobody was safe or assured of a life supporting income; unless you owned a lot of gold or a self sufficiency sustaining food growing farm, or both?
People eking out an existence on dole queues or good Samaritan charity, simply cost the economy.
They don't contribute tax or economy supporting discretionary spending, any more that a obscenely rich person does?
Given the rich person is already maxed out, consuming much more than he/she needs, or the good life or health dictate?
Yes, it is all over for Mitt Romney.
The Mitt has hit the fan.
He is pushing it uphill!
He has exposed his true character and plans, neither of which are suitable in a so-called economy rescuing American President? He seems to not understand, it's not about him!
All he seems to focus on, like any serial corporate raider, is the acquisition of, or wielding power; and or, even more privileges for those already over endowed with unearned, and therefore undeserved privilege?
Much of which has arguably been created by the creation and sale of patently worthless derivatives; and or, endless tax avoidance!
We can probably save the global economy or unearned privilege, but never ever both!
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 12:22:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Redistributing income upwards, to the wealthy, has long been Republican policy and it certainly hasn't created jobs. Its certainly worth seeing if putting more money in the hands of the poor so they can buy more stuff would work better.
Posted by Candide, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 12:52:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As long as the Republican party feels they have to appeal to the Christian Right and the uneducated -- two closely overlapping groups -- they are never going to be able to field a credible Presidential candidate. Nobody with enough intellect and integrity to have a serious chance at the job is going to sound convincing mouthing the naive platitudes that pass for Republican policies.

Unfortunately, the only thing that will improve the Republican party is an improvement in the Democratic party, which -- although it can still attract intelligent leaders -- is still heavily in thrall to naive fanatics of one kind or another.
Posted by Jon J, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 4:06:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If you lot are right about the Republicans making all the rich people richer, then I suppose there is a difference.

From what I observe, Obama specialises in making donors to his campaign funds very much richer, rather than just any old rich Joe.

He's given tax payer funds of from almost of a quarter to half a billion dollars each to a number these people, hopping on his fool solar & wind policies. Their companies all seem to go broke not that long after, but not before making their owners very rich, & of course returning a lump of those tax payer funds to the Obama re election war chest. It is all so simple really.

Then of course he's done a great job for the unemployed. Tens of thousands of coal miners, & oil workers have lost their jobs, thanks to him locking up any resource he can.

The greatest con job of course would be the clown now trying to claim the shale gas bonanza as his doing. Having fought tooth & nail against anything but what his renewables mates wanted stopped. Now he's lost that one, he wants to claim it. There is a lot of our Julia in their Obama, & none of it is good for the little bloke, here or there. It seems that an inability to tell the truth is a common trait in most lefty politicians.
Posted by Hasbeen, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:19:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Both Obama and Romney are owned by the Banking Military Industrial Complex.There is little difference between them.Romney is backed by the Zionist faction who want to attack Syria/Iran and expand the wars of imperialism.

It is just a matter of the lesser of two evils since Obama is less likely at the moment to take us to WW3.
Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 7:23:04 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy