That's a pretty funny article, a thousand or so words when the whole intent was in the last line.
Open Australia's borders and don't talk about ethnic or immigrant crime.
Why not just post one line?
This is what's called "Wordism", he's suggesting that because Gypsies have it tough in Europe it's okay for non White criminals to come to all White countries and only White countries.
Sounds silly when I phrase it that way doesn't it?
Trouble is since we have no figures available to us on ethnic and immigrant crime how does the author come to his conclusion that such crime shouldn't matter when we're talking about immigration?

I suspect that if we move the gypsies to Western Sydney many will lose their hands if the Muslims get Sharia like many of them would like.

What do you get when you cross one vicious racial stereotype with another vicious racial stereotype? Runner.

Aaaah the French! Once such an easy target for soft ridicule but now one of the few Countries with enough backbone and political will to actually enact policies to rid their Society of non-citizens who choose to break their laws and/or refuse to compromise imported customs to conform to French culture .... Vive la France!

Australian Politicians take a leaf ..... The consensus is already clear. Multiculturalism only works if there is similar level of respect and co-operation between the various cultural interests under the common umbrella of law and acceptable social mores. We are now far past the point of realisation this is often not the case here in Australia.

Come here as a new citizen, obey our laws, refrain from cultural practices that are illegal or offensive in our society, contribute to the health and wealth of the Nation through economic and social pursuits and be welcome. Otherwise go back to wherever you came from.

Rhian, what you get is a blithering idiot, who thinks they have some divine right to tell others what to think, how to act, & who to throw out.

It gets worse when you let then into a Uni, & they get some reflected authority behind their words. They then think they have some right to tell the public, their employers who to let in, & who not to throw out.

Sounds like you prefer the latter.

What would that make you?