Comment History for JulianC
The Forum > User Index > JulianC > Comment History
» 22/01/2013 1:57:17 PM Actually, Prompete, I am arguing the opposite to what you say. In my detailed study of thi.....
» 18/01/2013 5:48:38 PM Leo, Cheryl et al. The scientific and governmental sources for all the statements made in .....
» 14/11/2012 10:00:11 AM It seems PriceWaterhouseCoopers has weighed in on this discussion: they are in no doubt th.....
» 8/11/2012 9:10:49 AM Steven: I think you may be underestimating the electoral impact of a single weather event .....
» 7/11/2012 7:43:59 PM Thank heavens, Obama finally mentioned The Climate, in his victory speech: "America.......
» 5/11/2012 8:46:56 AM Don: the article wasn't about the frequency of hurricanes. It was about the failure of the.....
» 18/09/2012 10:36:23 AM Good piece, Bruce. The other aspect of this debate that merits cklose public scrutiny is w.....
» 28/08/2012 3:03:47 PM Atman: the answer is EO Wilson and Niles Eldrige, who probably know a heck of sight more b.....
» 26/08/2012 11:02:32 AM Atman - you need to read a bit of science, mate. Most past extinctinons were NOT from extr.....
» 25/08/2012 9:39:42 PM Wow! Heavy stuff, people. I must write more about nutrients: it obviously brings out the b.....
» 26/07/2012 12:30:37 PM Alfred et al. My primary aim here is to attract some global recognition of the sheer scale.....
» 22/08/2011 4:30:55 PM Thought that might get the dogs barking.... pity so few of them have the guts to sign thei.....
» 3/06/2011 7:12:06 PM Your still thinking only of the Australians, spindoc. I'm also thinking of the hundreds of.....
» 3/06/2011 6:53:41 PM Thanks, guys. As always, you can only fit so many issues into 700 words! Livio/popnperish.....
» 19/04/2011 8:49:13 AM Congratulations to Sheggen Fan and colleagues for their seven steps. These are very import.....
» 28/10/2010 1:26:55 PM "If there were a price on water used for growing rice and cotton, would famers grow t.....
» 18/03/2010 10:07:32 AM The evidence of a 'conspiracy' by resources corporations to deny the evidence for climate .....
» 25/09/2009 11:53:05 AM If the 'climate warmers' are wrong then the world will transition to a range of new, clean.....
» 25/09/2009 11:40:04 AM A great article, with some sound commonsense at the end. Two things though - first, world .....
» 27/08/2009 9:12:39 PM Thanks for some perceptive comments, guys. Couple of points. Yes, the world actually pass.....
» 2/04/2009 4:23:42 PM Be my guest, SJF. However, to be a credible neologism it needs a proper dictionary definit.....
» 2/04/2009 2:00:38 PM Bruce as usual makes good sense on geopolitics and especially on "gallipolism". .....
» 21/11/2007 8:57:11 AM OK, let me have a try at the population issue, based on a proposal I wrote for the CGIAR i.....
» 12/11/2007 8:04:01 PM Ludwig - you are right on the money. My problem is I never know how to get ALL the relevan.....
» 27/09/2007 10:59:11 AM Some quick responses to queries and points made: TurnRightThenLeft: I outlined the concept.....
» 13/09/2007 2:56:43 PM Oh dear, what a lot of naifs there are on this website, who have apparently never heard of.....
» 30/08/2007 11:42:09 AM Good points, Rob. However when I refer to human rights as the basis for developing new for.....
» 30/08/2007 9:29:27 AM I'm not opposed to GM, Rob. It's the Australian public (or most of 'em) that's opposed, th.....
» 14/08/2006 4:55:17 PM Ludwig - at the International Assn of Ag Economists, in Surfers now, I put this question t.....
» 13/08/2006 4:23:33 PM All solutions on the table, you said, Malcolm. First, please remind Australians they are .....
» 13/08/2006 3:41:12 PM Responding to Ludwig's excellent point: The surest form of contraception is prosperity. Al.....
31 comments in total: 31 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to JulianC's user info page
|
|
