Sentence: “ A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Subject of the sentence: A well regulated militia.
Which subject depends on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
In no way does the right of the people depend on the existence of the militia.

Equally obvious is that there is no granting of a right to keep and bear arms , merely a statement that their existing right to do so shall not be infringed.

Basic English.

Cumberland,

In order to insult me, I must first value your opinion.

Nice try, though.

By now, Australian tragics surely should have satisfied their desire to enmesh themselves in the American media frenzy.

As I stated earlier - truth will always be truth
regardless of lack to understand, disbelief, or
ignorance. And as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn pointed
out - "Mutual lack of understanding carries the
threat of imminent and violent destruction."
We can see this from what is happening in the US.

Understanding for some is just too much hard work.

I've given links that explain abortion rights in this
complex issue. I can't be held responsible for how
people interpret things:

http://britannica.com/event/Roe-v-Wade

http://amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/sexual-and-reproductive-rights/abortion-facts/

Foxy,
Of course you can’t be held responsible for how the Justices of the SCOTUS interpret things.

And the hits just keep coming....

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/supreme-court-epa-climate-pollution-ruling-1376017/

The poor leftists are becoming utterly deranged. More victories for the court that Trump fashioned.