The Forum > General Discussion > An Aboriginal Voice To Parliament Would Be Improper
An Aboriginal Voice To Parliament Would Be Improper
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 5:55:48 PM
| |
Keith Windcsuttle has a Masters in history. He has lectured in Australian history and in journalism. He is a prolific author, possibly best known, even by non-readers, for 'The Fabrication of Aboriginal History'. He is a scrupulous researcher, whose references in this latest article include:
Aborigines Protection Board, Report, 1893, p 3 A.W. Howitt, The Native Tribes of South-East Australia, (1904) Bain Attwood, The Making of the Aborigines Windschuttle has a lot more going for him than a few nobodies who get everything they know from the ABC. Survey of temperance habits, Aborigines Protection Board, Report, 1890, in Report to Legislative Council, in Votes and Proceedings, Legislative Assembly of New South Wales. Paul Hasluck, Shades of Darkness: Aboriginal Affairs 1925–1965 W.E.H. Stanner, ‘Durmugam: A Nangiomeri’, in Joseph B. Casagrande (ed.), In the Company of Men: Twenty Portraits by Anthropologists, Harper, New York, 1960, reprinted in Robert Manne (ed.) The Dreaming and Other Essays W. E. H. Stanner, ‘Continuity and Change among the Aborigines’, Presidential Address, Anthropology, Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science, Report of the Thirty Third Congress, Adelaide Strehlow, Songs of Central Australia, Angus and Robertson, Sydney, 1971. Barry Hill, Broken Song: T.G.H. Strehlow and Aboriginal Possessio T.G.H. Strehlow, diary, 28 May 1932, quoted by Barry Hill, Broken Song: T.G.H. Strehlow and Aboriginal Possession. Annette Hamilton, ‘Blacks and Whites: The Relationships of Change’ Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 6:49:17 PM
| |
Windschuttle has a lot more going for him than the nobodies who gained all their 'knowledge' from the ABC.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 6:51:32 PM
| |
Lets look at the facts:
http://utas.edu.au/library/companion_to_tasmanian_history/F.Fabrication.htm There's much, much more on the web. And the people doing the critiques are reputable historians with amazing credentials that even Windschuttle could not attack. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 7:22:08 PM
| |
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 7:26:06 PM
| |
Here's two more links:
http://blackincbooks.com.au/books/whitewash http://eurekastreet.com.au/article/windschuttle-s-whitewash Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 14 June 2022 7:41:52 PM
|
'Nations' does not at all describe disparate, wandering tribes that were little more than family groups. First Nations is a recent construct, lifted from North American literature and propaganda used to describe their natives. The fraud of 'nations' is akin to some of the 'rites' and 'ceremonies' invented recently: e.g 'welcome to country' and 'smoking ceremonies', the latter concocted by Ernie Dingo and a mate in the 1970s.
The things being shoved down our throats by Blacktivists and their white cronies are a gigantic scam.