http://youtu.be/TcmKy6wzbZo

Fish fossils found in Sahara
The planet follows cycles, due to the earths tilt.

Dear Bazz,

Mate I have taken a little stroll though some of your posts on this matter.

In 2007 you were saying “To be worrying about global warming is pointless.
The real problem is the peaking of oil production.” which you said would happen within the next 10 years severely cutting emissions.

Later that year you were claiming: “It appears the IPCC study and projections assumed that there would be unrestricted access to oil, gas and coal and also assumed growth continuing at the present rate. However these assumptions are incorrect and there will not be anywhere near enough CO2 generated to match the IPCCs model projections.” Didn't happen.

By 2009 you were claiming: “Whats wrong with the ETS ? It is redundant, that is what is wrong. Global warming is over, it is a none event now.” Didn't happen.


In mid 2010 it was: “Global warming will not be the problem many expect due to contraction in the economy.” Didn't happen or at least was only temporary.

Then: “The projections of the IPCC for fossil fuel use in coming years has been shown to be inaccurate and too high.” No they weren't.

Right though your message has been: “More time wasting argument. It does not matter whether global warming is true or not !” (2016)

In 2020 you said: “Global warming arrived on schedule with a peak around 2000 and will be with us for a 100 years or so. Then will slowly fall till the Londoners are again skating on the Thames in about 250 years time.”

But it didn't peak did it.

Now you are saying: “If the temperature stops rising in the next ten years it will be time to look for a fall in temperature.”

So we have been getting these long series of failed predictions. Why is your current stance any different?

Paul tells me he's been reading (wow!) and Australia didn't send wheat to India, despite being asked to. What he's been reading is a mystery.

But essentially what Paul is saying is that Australia, under the Curtin Labor government, despite having millions of tons of surplus wheat for export, refused to send any to India and are therefore responsible for the famine.

Paul must really hate the Curtin government.

Steel said;

In 2007 you were saying “To be worrying about global warming is pointless.
The real problem is the peaking of oil production.” which you said would happen within the next 10 years severely cutting emissions.

>>> Well, I got that right didn't I; Peak Crude Oil ocurred in 2005.
Why do you think the oil companies are planning their exit from the oil industry ?

Later that year you were claiming: “It appears the IPCC study and projections assumed that there would be unrestricted access to oil, gas and coal and also assumed growth continuing at the present rate. However these assumptions are incorrect and there will not be anywhere near enough CO2 generated to match the IPCCs model projections.” Didn't happen.

>>> What do you think is going on in the energy industry now ?

By 2009 you were claiming: “Whats wrong with the ETS ? It is redundant, that is what is wrong. Global warming is over, it is a none event now.” Didn't happen.

>>> Don't remember what the ets is, but looking more and more likely
that global warming might be over as it seems that the warming might have peaked either in the late 1990s or early 2000s.
The peak might be 100 years wide.

To be continued

Continued
In mid 2010 it was: “Global warming will not be the problem many expect due to contraction in the economy.” Didn't happen or at least was only temporary.

>>> Well that was before covirus and I said "many expect" but the economy did hang on.

Then: “The projections of the IPCC for fossil fuel use in coming years has been shown to be inaccurate and too high.” No they weren't.

>>> Thats right they were not too high but coal use is increasing
but oil consumption is restricted, hence the rush to electric cars.

Right though your message has been: “More time wasting argument. It does not matter whether global warming is true or not !” (2016)

>>> Yes that is still a true statement.

In 2020 you said: “Global warming arrived on schedule with a peak around 2000 and will be with us for a 100 years or so. Then will slowly fall till the Londoners are again skating on the Thames in about 250 years time.”
But it didn't peak did it.

>>> Certainly looks like it did, but will not know for certain
for another 50 years.

Now you are saying: “If the temperature stops rising in the next ten years it will be time to look for a fall in temperature.”

>>> Yes, that is still right. It took the Vikings a hundred years
or so before they finally decided to leave Greenland in the 1400s.

So we have been getting these long series of failed predictions. Why is your current stance any different?

>>> Basically it isn't any different. keep watching !
I still think that the basic theory that these cycles of global
warming are due to the various effects of the sun and that we are
near the peak temperature is correct. It is just conceit that makes
man think he can control the universe.

ITS THE SUN STUPID !

Posted by SteeleRedux, Tuesday, 10 May 2022 10:25:04 AM

mhaze, you would do well to read, instead you make things up to suit your narrative, well done Mr Goebbels. You make claims but provide no evidence of wheat exports from Australia to Bengal in 1943.