https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-02/whoopi-goldberg-apologises-for-saying-holocaust-was-not-about-ra/100798070

When she said 'the holocaust' was more about man's inhumanity to man, Whoopi Goldberg was right.
However, there was a flood of adverse opinion, apparently by those who act before they think.

At times of war or national crisis, governing bodies motivate people by using their instincts and emotions.
Useful amongst these would be hate, superstition, and fear.
Such responses, and others, can be used to strengthen determination, or create a desired level of aggression towards another person.

Hitler used an existing tenuous antipathy towards a particular group.
He amplified this to engender loathing of this group?
He encouraged and ordered those around him to destroy its members.
He didn't do the killing himself, except for one isolated instance, which he used as a kind of demonstration?

The fact that otherwise peaceful persons can be motivated to kill and harm without good reason, is an example of them showing an inhumane approach to their fellow man.
The devastation was thus brought about by a group of ordinary citizens, motivated to behave in a totally inhumane and disgraceful manner.
So Whoopi was and is right: the instinct to harm was 'amplified' by those with control, and it did the trick.
So why the onslaught of contrary opinion by a multitude of persons?
Hasn't anyone, other than Whoopi, thought this through?

Another instance of such control was demonstrated in the leadup to the Falklands War.
It is also demonstrated by the fluidity of boundaries within, and adjacent to, europe.
The map changes almost daily, as groups push and shove to gain advantage.
They do this instead of living peacefully and productively.
Are they being motivated by unscrupulous persons, who seek personal gain?
Such persons demonstrate the effectiveness of using 'man's inhumanity to man' as a weapon.

Who cares what a B grade Hollywood performer said? It's been long enough since she flapped her gums that most people have moved on to important current events.

Whoopi Goldberg said nothing out of place !

I guess it's ok for Hollywood to ridicule Christianity but they want to control what is said about "The Holocaust". It doesn't seem to be enough to say "I don't know but this is my opinion".

The ADL seems to be an Israeli front group- fronted by Jonathon Rothblatt and the ADC seems to be an Israeli front group fronted by Dvir Abramovich from the University Of Melbourne. They claim that they are secular non sectarian- I'm not sure about that-

It almost seems as if a significant number of Zionists are using Australian institutions to sponsor their special project in support of their own racial cultural dominance. All ethnicities and ideologies will try to dominate the environment in order to ensure their survival. Some perhaps have a greater validity in different contexts. It's seen as bad form to be sectarian within western government- the US seems to have made it part of it's ethos- perhaps they were wrong as it seems to enabled the descendants of the nation to be replaced in the name of secular equality.

mhaze from memory talked about racism from an Afro-American perspective in a previous post and how that was instantiated in Whoopee Goldberg's opinion. Interesting at her choice of stage name- seemingly having Hebrew influence.

Most people think that there are many other cases of ideological bigotry in the world that deserve more exposure seemingly by the Hebrew desire to keep their pet project in the spotlight. For example the death of 60 million people in Mao's China for cultural cleansing.

Everyone is bigoted- it seems to be part of group survival- I want groups cultures to survive.

Perhaps there's more to this than what I got to hear. All I heard was that the Holocaust wasn't racially motivated because it involved white people only !
Is that racist ?

I was observing a young indigenous mother this afternoon whilst i was waiting in line. Her little girl was hell-bent on having a white doll but Mom was dead against & tried to persuade her daughter to take the brown coloured doll. The girl wouldn't have it & the last I heard was mum whispering if she doesn't want the brown doll she can't have a doll.