ttbn,
Big plus.

Paul,
I came home a bit early but the score for the ten shooters was 1027 yesterday,
two of the granddaughters hunted for the first time on their own, just turned 18 and got their full licences.
We didn’t count piglets only ones big enough to fend for themselves.

Unless the Bill gives equal right to every citizen to express their belief it has failed. As it currently stands people like Paul1405 can vilify Christians and encourage hate against Chtistians with immunity and he does not have to stand before a Judge and prove the verasity of his statements. He knows nothing of the character of the principal yet vilifys him publicly.

This is an example of character defamation worthy of a trial to have Paul prove his words. This Forum is a public platform and can be accessed by anyone.

Bazz: However it is not the same in the Labour party. Cross the floor and vote against the party and you are out of the party.

Yes, a very Socialist & Marxist approach. The same sort of Rules apply to the Communist Party in China. Only there you most likely get shot.

Is Mise: Can a member of the Kiata Country Club say that their members must wear clothes at all times?

That should be "Mustn't" Been there. Nice place.

ttbn: I don’t understand why an atheist would want to have anything to do with a religious organisation.

A jobs a job. Ay.

Dear Ttbn,

«Should a person who publicly denies that there is god be in a religious organisation in the first place? Anyone that silly should expect to be kicked out. I don’t understand why an atheist would want to have anything to do with a religious organisation.»

Here is an example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOl7rLQtkho

Sticking with religion, would the members of the local Mosque be expected to allow an openly homosexual to teach in their school?

Good luck trying to make them adhere to inclusive rules.

No law can define "religion" anyway.

Nobody in their private capacity should be forced by the whip of the law to associate with others they do not wish to associate with - and no reason(s) need be given.

Public affairs are different of course. If one operates on behalf of a public body or receives public support of any kind, then of course the public may also set conditions for that support.

How can a so-called "religious" school accept public funds anyway while its own religious tenets clearly state "thou shalt not steal"?