I don't know shonky, you tell me.

Pauliar,

Surely you're not that stupid.

P.S. Your mate and neighbour Brendon Tarrant originally wanted you as a character witness but then realised it would harm his case. He's keeping a spot for you.

Paul1405 would call the US terrorist for attacking WWII Japan. Sometimes force is justified- the police just or unjustly use it ubiquitously. Would standing up to the Chinese immigrants in Tibet by the Tibetans be considered by Paul1405 as terrorist. I'm not saying that what Brenton Tarrant did was right or wrong based on his version of morality but at least we should try to understand his morality before judging it. It seems fairly clear that Tarrant's morality is in conflict with the establishment that control the enforcement apparatus the immigration policy, etc. It leads to the question of under what conditions laws should be constructed.

In this line of thought- there has been a recent perception of "encroachment of absolutes" such as anti-racist policy that seems even to trump the will of the people. Absolutes tend not to have the subtlety required by human situations.

It's a bit of a cop out to say that someone has done something because they are mad and leave it at that.

I think Paul1405 has missed a step- solving the problem before understanding it- but maybe I've done the same thing

I am saying what Brenton Tarrant did was definitely
wrong. He murdered 51 people and injured up to 40
in Christchurch. It was the worst mass murder attack
that New Zealand has ever seen. The man has been
given life in prison with no chance of parole.

His actions were inhuman. He showed no remorse. An
entirely self-absorbed psychopath. He failed to
achieve what he wanted - to divide New Zealand people.
He failed. Instead he united people. He's the loser.
The arms of New Zealand surrounded the victims and their
families. The arms became linked. Karna did the rest.

Hear, hear Foxy.

"Paul1405 would call the US terrorists for attacking Japan". The unclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 were acts of terror. Most other hostile acts were acts of war by both sides. Although atrocities were committed by all sides in the name of war. None of which I condone.

SM, you have a fellow traveler in CM. He attempts to mittigate and minimize, and then in some perverted way justify the terrorist acts of Brenton Tarrant with Nazi style nonsense.

"I'm (CM) not saying that what Brenton Tarrant did was right or wrong"

By all reasonable judgement what Tarrant did was WRONG, despite a Nazi looking for justification.

ps. Its you CM who advocates the unprovoked nuclear destruction of millions of innocent Chinese.

shonky, you said yourself you made some kind of pilgrimage to Christchurch recently in the name of work.

Paul1405's acts on OLO are possibly terrorist in nature- but it's not my decision to make- I can just try and analyse his motives.

Notice that Paul1405 didn't comment on the Tibet invasion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Tibet_by_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

Is Foxy implying that Brenton Tarrant tried to provoke a race war in New Zealand? Is she implying that a race war- or at least a change in racial dominance- is not already occurring? We should analyse these implications.

Cultural issues are in crisis worldwide. Universities and Mass Media are seemingly out of touch with large groups within nations. We need new moral assumptions.

Over thousands of years the nature of reality and morality has been redefined in some senses- we need to question some of the moral principles that have been recently adopted as absolute.

Many ideologies are quite happy to see other ideologies killed off along with the people if necessary- I plan to see my culture survive.

To help Tibetan culture survive- I can offer some assistance too- my culture is my priority.

I guess Paul1405 is happy to see unprovoked Chinese attacks on Tibetan's without the nations objection. It's naive to believe getting rid of the CCP heads won't be immediately replaced. The Chinese national infrastructure needs to be disabled.

Ayn Rand says "if the guilty don't pay the innocent must".

Geopolitics is a dirty business but there are a few ideas that are more likely to lead to stability and the survival of cultures.

I'm willing to look at the way that Tarrant thinks whether uncomfortable or not to discover if there is some small seed of possibility that points to a better future than that offered by the Mass Media the Universities awful Legal Systems and other self servers. Tarrant's interests parallel Mass Media/ University/ Legal Institutions- the institutions apparent failure to address the needs of many large groups within the nation- maybe it's time to at least listen to the so called "extremists".

I don't have all the answers- but some think they do- these are the people that try to force their ideas on you.