The Forum > General Discussion > Age Pension
Age Pension
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I refute your claim that I made "a negative post about the Age Pension". My position on aged welfare is two pronged, sustainability and equitability, I believe neither is delivered by the present system. For a politician to claim "no cuts" is a lie, just in recent years the minimum age has been raised from 65 to 67, and likely to rise to 70 in the foreseeable future, a cost saving in itself. The government keeps the deeming rate for notional calculation of interest earned well above the market rate, another saving. With a growing aged population, living longer, there is greater demand for both income support and aged care support from the total welfare budget, which is 35% of the total Federal budget. With growing interest payments on national debt, and demands for lower taxes etc, expenditure increases for direct welfare payments are not sustainable.
Equitability, there is none when it comes to aged welfare, pnsioners are not a homogeneous lot. At one extreme are those renting, with little in the way of assets or cash, these folks are getting by on the pension only. With a liberal means test, people owning their home, with assets and a generous amount of cash in the bank, are reasonably well off, and still receiving a full or part pension..