Yuyutsu,

It could make a big difference where the vote is close. In several electorates in the NSW sitting members lost their seats with as few as 16 votes. Even a SINGLE shonky voter could vote 16 times in a day.

As you say, people you claim get other people to vote for them is also fraud, requiring an electronic poll list to mark names off automatically in all polling booths. I presume your shonky aquaintances would give physical ID to their fellow fraudsters to present.

If Australians want fair elections the elections need
better rules to stop people from voting more than once,
voting as other electors, and voting in multiple
electorates during an election.

The following link has more:

http://voteaustralia.org.au/identifying_voters

Dear Ttbn,

«It could make a big difference where the vote is close.»

Difference? Of what kind?

Suppose one could bring on the cosmetic change of name/persona - then what?

Either way, it would remain one of the twin dinosaurs, why care which? same organisation, same concepts, same ministries, same persecution, same despair, with differences in "policies" that can only be seen through a microscope, they both have just one policy - to oppress us.

Ballots provide no way to just tell them: "Begone! Who are you anyway? Go to hell you all along with your stupid organisation we never consented to have anything to do with!".

«Even a SINGLE shonky voter could vote 16 times in a day.»

So why not? If a single person can buy pizza for 16 others, then why not do them this service of saving them the fine or humiliation, and at these times also, the risk of being infected or infecting others with COVID at the ballot place?

«I presume your shonky aquaintances would give physical ID to their fellow fraudsters to present.»

Possibly, as it would become a practical measure, but I hope it would not be needed because that would unnecessarily increase their risk of infection.

Anyway, let all those who cooperate with, aid and abet the state at the ballots in their attempt to obtain seeming legitimacy, receive a very special gift for their efforts - OMICRON!

Who put foward the Bill for Voter ID and who Voted it down? Was it the fraudsters?

How smart are Australian conservatives nowadays being led into a US cul de sac that will 'wreck' everything, when mostly voted for by ageing electors with short horizons, invested in by government on behalf of Australian citizens over generations?

Mr. Flint offers merely hearsay i.e. no evidence of significant fraud in Australia, but negative PR like this will allow Voter ID laws to be imported from the US.

Not only are the UK Tories considering something exactly the same, a solution looking for a problem, it's from the same Koch Network 'bill mill' ALEC that lobbies Congress, committees etc.. ALEC can be linked to NewsCorp, much seems about creating an authoritarian Anglosphere ruled by a WASP'ish (ably supported by wannabes) radical right libertarian minority demanding 'freedom & liberty', how Orwellian?.

So it's only "conservatives" who want integrity and honesty in voting, Andras Smith? I tend to agree with you.