Foxy,
Only accusations, not even charges?
Charges can be meaningless too, I well remember a lawyer friend who was defending a thief who had been caught with stolen goods a few hundred yards from the house that he’d broken into.
The police, just to make sure, also charged him with possession of a pistol.

In Court my friend was going to plead for mercy as his client was as guilty as they get, however probably through an oversight the pistol charge was included.
When the pistol was produced and tendered-as evidence the Judge asked my friend if he wished to examine it.
Suddenly deciding to do a “Perry Mason”, he said “No, Your Honour, that pistol’s been in Court so many times I can describe it from here.”
The Judge picked up the exhibit, scowelled, and, slamming the pistol onto the bench, said “Case dismissed” and to the Prosecutor and the detectives, “I’ll see you three in my chambers”.
Get the message?

Is Mise,

Pell's past record speaks for itself.
But as I keep repeating - he has been
found to be "legally" innocent.

Foxy,

All people found innocent in our Courts are legally innocent; didn’t you know that?

Is Mise,

Cardinal Pell was not found innocent.
You should know that.

Foxy, since you have evidence of guilt, I think it only fair that you have him charged so that justice is served.If you have no evidence then stop the deformation of Pell.

Josephus,

I did not raise the topic of Cardinal Pell in this
discussion. And as I keep stating his innocence
or guilt is now between him and his Confessor.
If you object to discussing the case - stop raising
the topic. I have no further wish to comment on it.