shadow minister,

We shall have to agree to disagree on this one.
I look forward to our next disagreement.

Is Mise,

Do you know how to keep an idiot waiting?

I'll tell you tomorrow.

Foxy,

So which of the rights are you happy to sacrifice?

The assumption of innocence?
The proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
The right to silence?

Are you happy to send innocent people to prison for long periods of time?

shadow minister,

Unless we don't particularly care about delivering justice
for the legions of victims of sexual abuse amongst us -
then something has to fundamentally shift in our legal
system. Pell did not give evidence at his own trial.
His version of events has never been revealed.

All we know is what he said at a press conference rather than
under oath that the crimes never happened. If we had a system
regarding sexual abuse cases would shift from a one-sided
contest of proving guilt on a legal standard to a singular
focus on getting to the truth all parties would have the
same role. To assist the court to get to the bottom of the
matter and determine what actually happened.

If it ain't broke don't fix it?
Well it's broken.

Read the link:

http://crikey.com.au/2020/04/09/pell-right-decision-wrong-system/

Foxy,
Just tell us how the jury system works.

Is Mise,

Why"

If you don't know just Google it.

I presume you know how to Google.

Foxy,
You’re the one who doubted that one juror could make a difference, I was just wondering if you’d taken the trouble to educate yourself out of such an idiotic misunderstanding of how the jury system works.