The Forum > General Discussion > 2500 years ago
2500 years ago
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Separation of religion and state are desirable and, I believe, necessary for a healthy democracy. In ancient Athens the great philosopher, Socrates, was condemned to death. One of the charges against him was impiety toward the gods. Lack of that separation flawed Athenian democracy.
Baptists were persecuted by the Church of England. Perhaps, the Baptist minister, Roger Williams, was mindful of that when he coined the expression, separation of church and state, and presided over Rhode Island colony which was the first unit of government anywhere in the world which had that separation in its basic law.
From Barry’s “Roger Williams and The Creation of the American Soul, NY: Viking (Penguin), 2012”
"The Bay's leaders, both lay and clergy, firmly believed that the state must enforce all of God's laws, and to do so the state had to prevent error in religion. This conviction they held fast to, for their souls and all the souls in Massachusetts plantation depended upon it.
Williams recognized that putting the state to that service required humans to interpret God's law. His views were not fully formed-how Massachusetts dealt with him would itself influence their formulation-but he believed that humans, being imperfect, would inevitably err in applying God's law. Hence, he concluded that a society built on the principles that Massachusetts espoused could at best only lead to hypocrisy, for he believed that forced worship "stinks in God's nostrils." At worst it would lead to a corruption not of the state which was already corrupt, but of the church, as it befouled itself with the state's errors. His understandings were edging him toward a belief he would later call "Soul Libertie." pp. 3-4
Religious people may think of the state as inevitably corrupt and its union with religion as corrupting religion.