Thanks "Albie Manton in Darwin" for your feedback. Also thanks to others for their comments.

You may be making Neanderthal's look bad by comparing them with Locke Liberal's- I expect they have several superior attributes. The end result of Globalism seems to be Global Tyranny either on the left or the right- or both- Locke Liberalism is a global philosophy.

People need to "draw between some lines" of virtue- virtue is somewhat arbitrary- it has some implications for the society. Even John Stuart Mill discounts "negative freedom" in the second half of his book- because everything affects everyone.

So there is a difference between those that believe in "virtue or freedom".

Societies (like people) need some borders and lines otherwise societies (and people) will die.

Prof Patrick Deneen talks about the failures of Locke Liberalism.

Thanks