The Forum > General Discussion > Lax Gun Control Led To Deaths
Lax Gun Control Led To Deaths
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
-
- All
Posted by Paul1405, Thursday, 15 April 2021 7:13:10 AM
| |
That's what I've got from you over the years.
Paul1405, You're not very observant are you. Only going by what you want to hear instead of hearing what's really happening. A classic sign of a useless to society hateful racist ! Posted by individual, Thursday, 15 April 2021 8:37:38 AM
| |
Yesterday the NSW Coroner Teresa O'Sullivan made public her findings and recommendations into Jack and Jennifer Edwards deaths. Ms O'Sullivan said; "The evidence before this court plainly reveals that the deaths of Jack and Jennifer were preventable." She went on to say, the procedures and practices within the NSW Firearms Registry were totally inadequate in determining a persons suitability to hold a gun licence.
That's narrow minded crap If he was willing to shoot his kids right Why would he not also be willing to stab the kids, run over the kids; Or commit harm to them some other way given his state of mind? Which could easily be pointed towards prescription drugs such as antidepressants, if he was on them. I searched your 272 page document for 'toxicology' but couldn't find it mentioned. WAS HE ON PRESCRIPTION ANTIDEPRESSANTS? That's what I want to know before we go any further. None of it matters until you prove he hadn't lost his chops on prescription meds. http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=nsw+coroners+report+john+edwards These morons would have you believe that if John Edwards weren't granted a gun license, That he'd be been a life loving law abiding member of the community, Or President of the Rotary club, Or Church leader, scout leader or the kids sports coach. Hell, if it wasn't for the firearms registry, John Edwards would've surely been making cupcakes and fairy-bread for the school fete. They'd tell you John Edwards didn't even do it, the gun did it. Hell, if John wasn't even there the gun might've done it anyway. This story proves that 'equality' is fantasy and bs. Some kids are always going to be dealt better or worse hands than others. Why do you want to do? Mandate that kids that come from good homes have to go through obligatory family breakups to make it fair for the kids that do go through this? And mandate that kids that go through difficult childhoods and family breakups - mandate that the government employs caring stand-in mums and dads to make up for those kids being impacted by situations that aren't their fault? Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 18 April 2021 9:34:15 PM
|
Didn't you claim you came here as a blow in, dodged national service, had a short stint as a menial public servant, was sacked for incompetence when Gough got in. Been on the long term dole, graduated to aged welfare and have hated Labor and the pubic service ever since. That's what I've got from you over the years.