Are you Welsh, Scottish or Irish?
Foxy,
You need to go back to where the Celts originated. I imagine some of their throwbacks have gone & settled in Wales, Scotland & Ireland !

All this palaver about ‘reconciliation and poor Aborigines is part of the sickening virtue signalling and self-hatred of weak whiteys. The kind that calls Anglo Saxons, Celts, Europeans - white people - who stand up for themselves ‘white supremacists’.

George Orwell remarked on Anglo and European self-hatred in the 1930s. He wrote that English Leftist intellectuals were unpatriotic. The hollowness of character has spread to all Anglo Europeans globally. Marxism has a good deal to do with it, particularly the Soviet kind, whose wiping out of majority Eastern Europeans peoples to protect minorities has a link with Western multiculturalism, which also spurns the majority and rejects nation and family.

To our lunatic Left, it is ‘racist’ to care more for a fellow ethnic than a randomly-chosen human. The Left is radically anti-national in Australia today. Their multiculturalism serves minorities, and keeps the immigration doors open to a continual flow of of co-ethnics.

Australians have been described as a “subaltern ethnicity”; second class citizens; the only ethnic group subjected to “gratuitous defamation and hostile interrogation” by the media, academia and race-relations bureaucracy.

Meanwhile, most Australians of of Aboriginal background are getting on with things like the rest of us. The few who want to remain part of a living museum are beyond help.

Reconciliation weeks and the like are just diversions, staged by activists of the Left to divert us from their evil intent and the real problems in Australia.

The Uluru statement.
http://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/2017-05/Uluru_Statement_From_The_Heart_0.PDF

It is evident we have two laws and two nations living on the same land , which is a conflict of interest, and reconciliation is never likely to happen. However if the CCP take over Australia no such treaties will be recognised, and aboriginals will be placed in re-education camps. Those that accept the laws of the ruling class will survive, the others will be disposed of.

Well, still no one has offered an explanation as to what reconciliation would look like, how we'd know when we were reconciled. When you don't know the destination it's really impossible to chart the course.

As suspected reconciliation is really about one small group demanding unspecified and (especially) unquantified benefits and another, somewhat larger (but still very much minority) group cheering them on.They don't know exactly what the dissatisfied aboriginal complainants want but they know that they should get it, whatever it is. And somehow they convince themselves this is a moral stance.

In the end, this is merely about one group demanding never-ending handouts and another group virtue signalling their acquiescence and demanding that someone else should pay up.

Paul wrote...."It was the Whitlam government in the 1970's, less than 50 years ago, that made the first attempt to right the injustices of the past."

The Aboriginal Referendum took place in 1967. Whitlam won power in 1972. Oh dear.

Seriously, Paul's historic knowledge is so abysmal that , if he told me what he had for breakfast yesterday, I'd want confirmation.

Foxy,

Yes, Jack Daniels, and Johnny Walker and Jim Beam as well.

You obviously picked up on the fact that I'm a heavy drinker. The first couple of dozen shots in the morning makes my world look pretty rosy but after another half dozen bottles in the afternoon things start to look a bit dark and threatening and before one knows it I want to fight the world.

Well, that's what happens when one takes up drinking as an 8 year old. I should have listened to dear old mum and stuck to the marijuana and cocaine.